Jerry Moore's S-G Commentary & Information Pages Home myshortpencil.com Home Page
Search for
This Site
The Web

Want your article published?  Need help posting messages?  Send email to Jerry.

Home ] School Talk ] Surveys ] Resources ] S-G Schools ] Blog ] K12WIKI ]
 

Can Religion Be Taught in Public Schools?

Updated 16 Oct 2006

For the most recent information on religion in public schools, please see Church & Public Schools in School Talk.

November 30, 1999:  Can the Bible be taught in public schools?  The National Bible Association and The First Amendment Center (now called The Freedom Forum Online) say it can be done.  Public schools should "become places where religion and religious conviction are treated with fairness and respect," according to their joint report, The Bible & Public Schools: A First Amendment Guide.  The report is endorsed by the National School Boards Association.  You can download the report, and you can read about an Ohio school where religion is taught in a public elementary school.  In the context of asking 12-year-old students about sexual practices and criminal behaviors on surveys--all without the need for parental permission--it is very interesting that the Ohio school requires parents to sign permission slips before students can be presented with religious information.

Below is the statement from Americans United, explaining why religion cannot be a part of public education.

AMERICANS UNITED STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO THE FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL'S 'HANG TEN' CAMPAIGN

The Family Research Council, a Washington, D.C.-based Religious Right group, recently announced a new initiative it calls "Hang Ten." FRC's project encourages public school authorities and other government officials to post the Ten Commandments at public buildings. The movement has caught on in several Kentucky counties recently, and FRC is trying to make it a nationwide phenomenon.

According to Americans United for Separation of Church and State, government display of religious codes, whether at public schools, city halls, courtrooms or other government facilities, is a bad idea. Why? Here are ten good reasons:

1. The Constitution mandates the separation of church and state. This means government is forbidden to meddle in matters of religion. Promotion of religious ideals is the job of America's houses of worship. Thus government display of the Ten Commandments violates a fundamental tenet of American life, one that has given us more religious liberty than any people in world history.

2. The Supreme Court and lower courts have settled the issue. In 1980's Stone v. Graham decision, the high court struck down a Kentucky law that required public schools to post the Ten Commandments. Lower federal courts have struck down the display of the Decalogue at government buildings as well. Public schools or local governments that exhibit the Ten Commandments are inviting a lawsuit they are almost certain to lose. Government officials should not squander taxpayer dollars on futile litigation.

3. America is religiously diverse. The United States is home to nearly 2,000 different religions, traditions, denominations and sects. While many of these groups revere the Ten Commandments, many do not. If government officials put up the Decalogue, will they also post the Five Pillars of Islam, the Four Noble Truths of Buddhism [click here for more information], the Wiccan Rede and the Affirmations of Humanism? Government should never play favorites when it comes to religion.

4. Religion doesn't need government's help to promote the Ten Commandments. For a few thousands years, the leaders of Judaism and Christianity have been doing a pretty good job of getting the word out about the Ten Commandments. Interjecting the state in the picture will only mess up a good thing.

5. There is no "standard version" of the Ten Commandments. Different religions and denominations list the commandments in different order and use different language. When government agencies and public schools post one version and not others, they are taking sides in a (sometimes contentious) theological debate. That simply is not government's job.

6. The Ten Commandments are not a "secular" moral code that everyone can agree on. Indeed, four of the Ten Commandments are specifically religious in nature. People have fought and died because they disagreed over what constitutes a "false god" or over the meaning of the ban on worshipping a "graven image." Read any history of Europe if you want to see how bad things can get when government decides to take sides in debates like these.

7. The Ten Commandments are not a magic charm that can make all of society's problems vanish overnight. Some Religious Right groups and politicians treat the commandments as though they are a lucky rabbit's foot -- post them on the wall and all of society's ills will disappear! This is simplistic thinking -- and it distracts us from the hard work of solving thorny social problems.

8. The Ten Commandments are open to different interpretations. One commandment reads, "Thou shall not kill." Or is that "Thou shall not murder"? The language and meaning depends on what version of the Bible you read and your faith's understanding of it. If it's the former, does that really mean all killing, even in self defense? Elsewhere we are admonished to keep holy the Sabbath -- but is that Friday, Saturday or Sunday? Religious leaders differ on these questions. They -- not government bureaucrats -- are best suited to interpret the commandments for their individual congregants.

9. Politicians and interest groups are exploiting the Ten Commandments for political gain. Let's face it, many politicians and special interest groups seem ready these days to use religious symbols and religious language to win elections. Do we really want sanctimonious, poll-obsessed politicians -- many of whom don't impose the Ten Commandments on themselves -- imposing them on us?

10. The Religious Right's use of the Ten Commandments borders on blasphemy. Religious Right groups like the Christian Coalition and the FRC use the Ten Commandments to advance their political agenda. They force action on symbolic resolutions and issues in the hope that politicians who oppose such displays can be defeated in the next election. People who believe the commandments are God's holy word should be appalled at this cynical manipulation of a religious document.

So, to any government official who is tempted to "Hang Ten" at the Family Research Council's urging, we advise a little research into basic American principles. And remember, Americans United has litigated several of these case before -- and won them all.

In short, there's a big wave up ahead that will probably knock the Family Research Council's "Hang Ten" scheme right out of the water. It's called the Constitution.

Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization represents 60,000 members and allied houses of worship in all 50 states.

© Americans United for Separation of Church and State, 1999. All rights reserved.

518 C Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20002 202-466-3234

 

Hancock County schools teach religion in classroom

November 28, 1999

 

RAWSON, O. - A single student sits in the back of the small classroom, headphones blocking out the teacher and her lesson.

It is a lesson that the third grader doesn't have to listen to -- a lesson, some say, none of the youngsters at Cory-Rawson Elementary School should be hearing inside their public school.

"Psalms 92:1," the children recite in unison. "It is a good thing to give thanks unto the Lord and to sing praises onto thy name, O Most High."

"Who would like to try it on their own?" asks the teacher, Patty Collins. Several hands shoot into the air. Each child recites the verse flawlessly.

For more than 50 years, teachers paid by the Hancock County Religious Education Association have been holding weekly, 20-minute classes with elementary students that include Bible verses and stories, songs about God, and general words of encouragement. Attendance at the classes is optional. Youngsters must have their parents sign permission slips for them to attend, but most take part.

And most of their parents are fiercely defensive of the classes they enjoyed as children growing up in the same communities. Never mind that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1948 that offering religious instruction on public school property during the school day was unconstitutional.

"We're not really studying religion. We're helping kids learn how to behave and how to treat each other," said Dick Powell, a retired pastor and president of the nondenominational religious education association since 1961. "It is not a doctrine we're teaching. We're just trying to teach the children choices - what's right and wrong."

Officials with area school districts that host the classes argue that no one has objected to the weekly instruction. But at least two area districts ended the long-standing tradition this fall when complaints were lodged.

In Arcadia Local Schools, the board in September decided to drop the class after several complaints and a threat of legal action were made. Arrangements are being made to resume the class at a nearby church. The district north of Findlay has 650 pupils.

In Van Wert County, Crestview Local Schools four weeks ago suspended the teaching of a similar class by the local Heritage Fund Board because of complaints and the threat of a lawsuit. Community members there are seeking a new location for the class, which had been offered for children in kindergarten through sixth grade.

Crestview Superintendent Beth Hargreaves said she was taken aback by the class when she was hired two years ago. But she said she didn't feel it was her place to end it until complaints were registered. The district has about 1,000 pupils.

"I came in and tried to be respectful of what I thought was the fabric of the community and I tried to honor that, but I still have a legal responsibility to uphold the Constitution and the law," she said. "It puts us in a pickle .  .  . Even some of our board members are struggling with their responsibilities as public people when privately they are very devout Christian people."

Critics say there should be no struggle.

"The Constitution is not optional for public schools," said Steve Benen, spokesman for the Washington-based Americans United for Separation of Church and State. "They don't have the luxury of whether or not they want to agree with the Supreme Court about the Constitution. The law does not afford them that luxury, nor should they have it."

Ray Vasvari, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, said it's not up to a community to decide whether such classes belong in the public schools.

"It's not a matter of community standards," Mr. Vasvari said. "We have one standard, a national standard, that prohibits the state from getting into the religion business or endorsing religion.''

No one is quite sure when the Hancock County Religious Education Association began. A Methodist minister in McComb started the education effort in that town at least 55 years ago, according to Mr. Powell, and his idea eventually spread throughout the county.

Since then, the association, which exists solely to offer the classes at local schools, has been funded by donations from individuals, organizations, and churches of nearly every Christian denomination. Two instructors - Mr. Powell's wife, Dorothy, and Ms. Collins, who has been employed by the association for 41 years - visit the schools and in some cases a designated church near the schools, one day each week.

State law allows schools to dismiss students during the school day to attend off-premise religious instruction as long as the school neither encourages or discourages participation. It also allows public schools to teach objectively about the Bible as literature or about the impact religion has had on history. It does not permit the kind of class taught one day recently to third graders at Cory-Rawson Elementary.

The class has 16 children. Fifteen listened attentively as Ms. Collins told them a Bible story about Samuel and how he was chosen by God to be a great leader. One student chose not to participate in the discussion. Wearing headphones, the boy quietly did schoolwork.

Before leaving the classroom, Ms. Collins reminded students to give thanks before their Thanksgiving meal.

"The pilgrims came and fought for a lot of freedoms for us, including the freedom to worship God the way we want to," she told them.

In the hallway outside, children rushed up to hug Ms. Collins.

"My mom said to tell you hi," one girl said, wrapping her arms around the 62-year-old.

"I had her mother in class when she was a girl," Ms. Collins explained.

Stephen Puchta, superintendent of Vanlue Local Schools, was in Ms. Collins's religion class at Vanlue Elementary in the early 1960s. His district continues to host the class, and he said few, if any, youngsters choose not to attend.

"It was very positive," Mr. Puchta said. "She's very pleasant and makes it very enjoyable, very nonthreatening. It's not going to hurt anyone. It didn't hurt me."

Susan Lambert, 45, said she enjoyed the class as a youngster at Cory-Rawson Elementary. The district has about 800 pupils.

"It seemed like everybody just had a different feeling when she came in," she said. "There was just a camaraderie."

Ms. Collins said she meets with 1,200 students a week from Cory-Rawson, McComb, Liberty-Benton, and Vanlue schools in Hancock County and at Leipsic Elementary in Putnam County. Mrs. Powell teaches at McComb Middle School, Arlington, and Arcadia. In each case except Liberty-Benton - and now Arcadia - the classes are held inside the school buildings.

The Liberty-Benton school system just west of Findlay has grown so much in recent years, the district now has nearly every world religion represented in its student body, said Superintendent Dennis Recker. He said the district chose to move the religion class to a nearby church three years ago when "people of other religious persuasions" complained that they were offended by it.

Years ago, Edyie Addington, who describes herself as an agnostic, let her two children decide whether to attend the religious education class offered at Arcadia Elementary. Initially, they decided not to, but after spending the weekly class time sitting in the hallway, they changed their minds the next year.

"My kids were upset. Everybody would walk by and stare at them like, 'What did you do?' " Mrs. Addington recalled.

She knew the class violated the Constitution but said nothing.

"I went through all these years and just kept my mouth shut," she said. "I didn't want my kids to have a problem so I didn't say anything."

The ACLU's Mr. Vasvari said therein lies the problem.

"The Constitution is designed to protect majorities from abusing minorities .  .  .," he said. "The problem is when you have everyone saying they want it, you may have a few who are afraid to say they don't. These issues are personal. No one wants to take the stand."

In 1984, the parents of two Findlay City Schools students sued the school board in federal court over a class offered by the Findlay Weekday Religious Education Council in the city's 10 public elementary buildings.

After reviewing the case, Judge John Potter of U.S. District Court ordered the school to stop holding the class.

"The policy impermissibly advances nonsecular interests in that it creates, for impressionable 8 and 9-year-old children, the appearance of official support for religion," Judge Potter wrote in his 1985 decision.

Despite the ruling, the county schools continued to host the class. No one sued them. Had they, the outcome would have been inevitable.

In 1948, the U.S. Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional for the Champaign, Ill., public schools to allow clergy and others into the schools to offer religious instruction. The ruling has been upheld time and again.

"When you allow people to come right in the building during school hours to promote particular sectarian views, then you really are suggesting both that school authorities are supporting this and that this is the right thing to do," said Jonathan Entin, professor of law at Case Western Reserve University.

"Someone who might have a different idea might feel singled out for disapproval and that could promote various types of conflicts and division in the schools,'' he said.

Arcadia Superintendent David Lewis said residents were disappointed when the board discontinued the religion class this fall.

"Some people would say it is good for all kids, but they're not thinking of the child who is being taught something different at home and either has to leave the classroom or sit and listen to something different than what they're being taught,'' he said.

The fact that several area schools continue to offer religious education classes is astounding to some.

"This sounds like something that you may have found 35 years ago in some parts of the country that were just completely unaware that the Supreme Court had outlawed this," Mr. Benen said. "The fact that this is happening in 1999 borders on outrageous. It's inviting a lawsuit that the school district would instantly lose."

Richard Steiner, superintendent at Cory-Rawson Local Schools south of Findlay, said he knows the class is illegal, but until it is challenged, it will remain.

"What it does or hopefully what it does is help the kids make the right decisions," Mr. Steiner said. "Our school discipline has been excellent over the years. I can't say whether [the class] has contributed or not, but I hope it has."

Mr. Benen questions that type of thinking. "What kind of example are school administrators setting when they say, 'We're aware of the fact that we're breaking the law, but we're going to do it anyway until we get caught.' What is that telling children?" he asked.

Mr. Powell said the association will continue doing what it's doing even if it means finding a location away from the schools to hold the classes.

"As long as we have the permission to do it we feel that it's all right," Mr. Powell said. "It is a public building and if you think about it the people who support this program also pay taxes."

The Van Wert City Schools inherited the problem in 1988, when Ohio City merged with the district. At the small elementary school in Ohio City not far from the Indiana border, religious education has been a tradition.

"It's part of the culture of that community and they expect it to happen there at their school, and as long as we're not challenged, we're going to support it," Superintendent John Basinger said. "But we'll never defend it using any public tax dollars because you can't defend it. I think all the case history is pretty clear."

Mr. Vasvari said the classes cannot continue.

"This is a matter of genuine concern to the ACLU of Ohio. It is something we will look into further," he said. "These practices violate 36 years of established First Amendment precedent. They are plainly illegal, and they must stop."

© 1999, The Blade, All Rights Reserved.

Even before new guidelines, Bible on South's reading list

By VICKI GUARINO

A new curriculum guide released nationally last month tells a group of Medford teachers something they've known for several years: The Bible is a valuable resource for literature studies.

"The Bible and Public Schools: A First Amendment Guide" has received across-the-board endorsement from Christian educators, Jewish groups, school boards and labor unions. The guide lays out for teachers a middle ground between those who want Bible courses in schools to promote faith and those who prefer God never be mentioned in the classroom.

It encourages schools to offer courses in the Bible as literature; explain the role of religion in political and social movements such as abolition, temperance and civil rights; and expose students to the basic ideas of the world's major religions.

Those are some of the things South Medford High School teachers have been doing for five years. Freshmen in honors English classes have been reading Genesis to gain a background and understanding of the Jewish people in connection with a classroom examination of the Holocaust.

Genesis tells students something of the history of the Jewish people, engendering a deeper understanding of the Holocaust, says South teacher Todd Bloomquist.

South students read, discuss and analyze the Bible not as history or as a matter of faith, but as literature, he says.

The stories of Genesis stand on their own as literary works and serve to illuminate Jewish history, says Bloomquist, and they provide students with reference points for further reading throughout high school and college.

"The Bible is the single most quoted piece of literature that has ever been written," Bloomquist says. "It's the biggest publication there is. Ignoring it is silly."

The newly released education guide makes a similar conclusion.

Students "cannot be uncritically taught to accept the Bible as literally true, as history," the guide states, but neither can schools "jettison accounts of miraculous events ... for it radically distorts the meaning of the Bible."

The guide was developed by the Freedom Forum's First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., and the National Bible Association.

"The First Amendment is not intended to make our schools a religion-free zone," said Charles Haynes, senior scholar at the center.

It was the very presence of the Bible at South that prompted Bloomquist to introduce it in the classroom. He came across volumes of the King James Bible, given freely by Gideons International, in a South storeroom.

At the time, Bloomquist was looking for materials for students that he could tie into the Holocaust studies.

"I was looking for resources and I stumbled across those Gideon Bibles," he said.

Bibles long have been acceptable as a teaching resource, Bloomquist found when he checked Medford school district curriculum guides. He figures the book fell into disuse because teachers became wary of its potential political charge.

"I think people are scared of it, and there's an assumption that you can't use it, but that's not true at all," he says. "It's not illegal as long as it's taught appropriately."

Publishers of the "Bible and Public Schools" guide point out that the Supreme Court has ruled that public schools may teach students about the Bible as long as the teaching is "presented objectively as part of a secular program of education."

Bloomquist says, "No one wants anybody's faith or theology jammed down their kid's throats."

Aware of the potential for misunderstanding, however, Bloomquist and other South teachers have made a point of discussing the Bible use in the classroom during parent conferences. Also, the teachers send a letter home explaining the literary study.

Only once has a parent expressed concern, but the issues were resolved after a conference with Bloomquist.

"I'd say if there has been any comment at all it has been a very positive response," he says

Copyright 1999 Oregon Mail Tribune.  All rights reserved.

 

 

School Talk ] Surveys ] Resources ] S-G Schools ] Blog ] K12WIKI ]


© 1999-2008 Jerry Moore. All rights reserved. Terms of use.

Thanks for visiting.  Visits since 22 Jul 1999:

4,285,949