Legislators favor longer school days
By ANTHONY CARDINALE
Buffalo News Staff Reporter
6/29/01
More students would meet state academic
standards if they had a longer school day as well as after-hours access
to their schools, public officials said Thursday during a forum on the
needs of schoolchildren.
A pledge to convince the governor that
more money is needed for education was also made by the speakers -
Deputy Assembly Speaker Arthur O. Eve, Assemblyman Sam Hoyt and State
Sen. Byron W. Brown, all Buffalo Democrats.
They spoke to 20 residents at New Hope
Baptist Church on Richmond Avenue, where the sponsor of the forum, the
Alliance for Quality Education, distributed leaflets telling how to put
pressure on Gov. George E. Pataki and Legislature leaders to pass a
state budget with increases in funding for education.
Asked by one parent, Antoinette Guercio,
how many students might be harmed by increased pressure to meet state
standards, Hoyt said he favors the higher Regents standards but thinks
they should be introduced in steps, with full funding to do the job.
"I'm for a longer school year, or a
longer school day," Hoyt said. "And we need professional
development of teachers to help our students meet these standards."
Regina Eaton, state director of the
Alliance for Quality Education, agreed that a longer school day may be
needed.
"A kid may need an hour to perform
a half-hour task," she said. "This is a huge problem."
Eve said schools also should be open
after hours, and even on Saturdays, to allow students to spend more time
in mastering English and math requirements. Schools could be opened
after school hours by staggering the schedules of school engineers, he
said.
"You can call your School Board
members, who are negotiating a very lucrative contract with school
engineers right now, and tell them not to sign that contract unless it
allows schools to open after school hours," he said.
After a lengthy discussion of the many
obstacles to student achievement, Brown said, "What I've heard
tonight is really reflective of a late state budget, and the governor
proposing not to increase funding for education."
Brown encouraged residents to exert
pressure to pass a budget by contacting the Albany offices of the
governor and Senate Majority Leader Joseph L. Bruno.
Hoyt said that Democrats in the Assembly
want to increase funding for public education by $1 billion and that the
governor has been balking. He and Eve blamed Pataki for the overdue
state budget.
"The governor has chosen not to be
part of the process," Eve said. "He prefers to pick and choose
and line-veto whatever items he doesn't like in the budget" that
will eventually emerge from the Legislature.
Eaton said the late state budget is
forcing school boards to adopt their budgets "in a vacuum,"
guessing what their state aid will be and postponing the hiring of new
teachers until just before Labor Day.
Teachers
Think 5th Year Would Help
By ANJETTA
MCQUEEN, AP Education Writer, July 3, 2000
From the
L.A. Times
PHILADELPHIA
--
While students may cringe at the idea of a fifth year of high school, a
teacher's union president says that's the ideal prescription for those
least prepared to continue their education or enter the work force.
"It's a choice between letting kids
fall through the cracks .... or doing whatever it takes to bring them up
to par," said Sandra Feldman, president of the American Federation
of Teachers, who's proposing a special "transitional year" for
students in danger of failing high school exit exams or of dropping out
before even taking the test.
It's one of the ideas to be discussed as
thousands of educators attend simultaneous meetings of the two major
teachers' unions this week, shaping their lobbying agendas and plans for
the new school year.
Under Feldman's proposal -to be put before her
union on Monday -specially trained teachers would help students by using
methods employed to catch up military recruits, high school drop outs
and other teens and young adults with minimal reading skills. The
current system, Feldman said in an interview last week, is unfair to
students who have been promoted regardless of grades or test scores,
then asked to pass tough tests for their diplomas. About 30 states have
such exit exams.
However, states set their own school
schedules. Kindergarten is not even mandatory in every state, so most
students only get grades one through 12.
It's unclear whether teachers, students
and parents would welcome any change in the dozen years a child usually
spends in school: "When it comes to stigmatizing students, there's
not going to be any difference between holding a student back or adding
a year," said Galen Price, a North Carolina 12th-grader who heads
the International Student Activism Alliance, a nationwide network that
follows state and federal education policy.
Districts -already adding summer, Saturday
and after-school classes for struggling students -might balk at another
reason to find more classrooms and more teachers for extra kids.
"It's definitely going to be a
financial stress on them," said Judy Seltz, a spokeswoman for the
American Association of School Administrators. "Even if that fifth
year has a substantially smaller enrollment, there's still staffing and
space implications."
In remarks prepared for Monday's opening
of the union's 76th annual meeting, Feldman says educators could provide
the extra help if state and federal lawmakers used the nation's economic
prosperity to build new schools and hire more teachers: "The fact
is, too many of our political leaders and school officials are not doing
their part."
While the AFT, representing 1 million
teachers in larger cities, meets here, the National Education
Association, the largest group with 2.5 million members, is meeting in
Chicago.
Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore,
who's won the endorsement of both groups, is slated to appear in
Philadelphia and Chicago this week.
July is traditionally when the nation's
schoolteachers meet to set priorities for how they'll teach in
classrooms and how they'll bargain with the people who sign their
paychecks. This year -with elections nearing -a flurry of proposals will
give teachers much to contemplate: Link their pay to students' scores?
Take a mandatory test to keep their licenses? Pay higher dues?
Some of the new issues on the table at
both meetings are first nibbles for organizations usually seen as
entrenched and resistant to change.
Roughly 4,000 delegates expected at AFT
will decide the union's position on testing teachers and raising
standards for charter schools and online colleges.
Nearly 9,000 delegates of the NEA,
recently criticized for how it reports the funds it spends on political
activities, are slated to consider the union's policy on turning around
low-performing schools, school privatization, and teacher pay based on
performance, rather than seniority.
They will also approve state-level mergers
of the two unions in Florida and Montana. Meanwhile, the persistent, but
unsuccessful, mission to merge the two labor groups will continue with
high-level, behind-the-scenes talks, leaders say.
-------
On the Net:
http://www.aft.org
http://www.nea.org
Search
the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories. You
will not be charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one.
School year may be
longer for some
WFTV
Eyewitness News ,
8/3/1999
The new school year is just days away, but the school year could be
30 days longer on some local campuses.
The Volusia County School District has proposed that four schools
extend the year from 180 days to 210 days.
The schools are McInnis Elementary, Seville Public, Pierson
Elementary and Taylor Middle School.
This is just an experimental program at this point. The state now has
to decide whether to fund those extended school calendars. The first
three schools are feeders for Taylor Middle, and the new plan would keep
kids on the same schedule when they move from elementary up to middle
school.
Poll: 53% nix longer school year
Associated Press
Iowa News
. DES MOINES (AP) - Most Iowans oppose the idea of extending the
school day and the school year, according to a poll released Tuesday.
The Des Moines Register's copyrighted Iowa Poll said 53 percent of
Iowans oppose the idea of lengthening the 180-day school year, while 45
percent approve.
The idea of lengthening the standard school day draws even stronger
opposition from Iowans - 60 percent against and just 38 percent in
favor.
The poll comes at a time when a state educational reform commission
is considering the idea of providing more instruction time for Iowa
students.
Marvin Pomerantz, a Des Moines businessman and chairman of the
commission, said he expects the commission to recommend that schools be
kept open year-round to act as community centers.
Whether that idea leads to a recommendation for longer school days or
a longer school year will become clear when the commission issues its
report in mid-September.
The commission, which was appointed by Gov. Terry Branstad, is
expected to set the agenda for a major debate of school policies in the
1998 Legislature, which convenes in January.
The Iowa Poll, conducted June 26-July 2, is based on telephone
interviews with 800 Iowans age 18 or older. It has a margin of error of
plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
1997
Associated Press
Longer
school year plan could help provide answers
Athens
Daily News, March 8, 1998
It seems logical to assume that the more time one spends studying, doing
homework and actively participating in the classroom, the more one will
learn.
There is evidence to indicate a strong correlation
between the length of time spent in scholarly pursuits and the level of
academic achievement.
Japanese students, for example, spend 245 days a year
in school and consistently score higher on many tests than U.S. students
who typically spend only 180 days a year in the classroom.
Whether a longer school year will help Georgia
students is the question posed in a proposition being considered by the
state Senate after it was discussed and approved in the House last week.
Rep. Charles Smith of St. Marys wants to encourage
Georgia schools to experiment with a longer year. He won approval in the
House for additional funding for those school systems that take up the
challenge.
Under the provisions of a bill sent to the Senate,
schools and systems could apply for three-year grants to lengthen the
school year.
The pilot program initially calls for only two grants:
for one school and one system. Schools or systems going to a 200-day
school year would get a 20 percent boost in state funding. Employees of
those schools would get at least a 10 percent raise.
Schools going to a 220-day school year would get 40
percent more money, and their employees at least a 20 percent raise.
A number of factors, including economic status,
parental involvement, the education level of parents and others
circumstances influence academic performance.
While those elements cannot be controlled by those who
want to improve education, the amount of time a child spends in the
classroom can be.
Rep. Smith's proposed experiment may not be the answer
to Georgia's education woes, but it could be part of the solution. It's
worth a try to see what impact a 200- or 220-day school year would have
on the educational achievement of the state's children.
8 to 5: Some educators like Barnes' latest plan to improve schools
by lengthening the day Jennifer Brett - Staff Thursday, November 30,
2000
Fear that Georgia's students
might be forced into a nine-hour school day kept Gov. Roy Barnes' chief
education adviser busy Wednesday. Ron Newcomb stressed to his many
callers that an 8 a.m.-to-5 p.m. middle school schedule would not be
mandatory.
Still, some metro educators
have taken a shine to the idea, proposed earlier this week as a
volunteer pilot program by the governor's Education Reform Study
Commission. Members also recommend increasing the minimum time middle
school students spend in core academic subjects from 4 1/2 to five hours
a day. But the nine-hour day was the more powerful attention-grabber.
"It's not something we're
mandating or even something we're trying to push," said Newcomb,
who fielded calls Wednesday from legislators nervous their constituents'
children were about to be forced to go to school from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
He said the proposal would benefit schools that already offer
after-school enrichment programs and would like funding to offer all
students the extra hours of instruction.
"If, on a volunteer basis,
some school wants to pilot and fund a longer middle school day, let's
take a look at helping them out," Newcomb said. The commission
wants the state to provide funding for at least six middle schools to
try the longer schedule, which has reportedly proven successful
elsewhere in raising student achievement.
DeKalb County schools
Superintendent James Hallford likes the proposal so much that he phoned
the governor Wednesday and asked that a DeKalb middle school be included
in the pilot.
"Our superintendent and
each of us who serve at his discretion are totally supportive of the
governor's reform proposals," said Marion Anders, executive
director for middle school instruction in DeKalb County.
Anders said the DeKalb system
is already doing some of the other things mentioned in the reform
proposals, including having students spend at least five hours per day
in core academic subjects. In addition to that, the system uses grant
money to pay teachers extra to tutor low-achieving students in reading.
Paul Kraack, a former teacher
and spokesman for the Clayton County school system, also endorsed giving
the longer day a try.
"In education, anything we
can do to increase student achievement, we need to take a look at,"
he said.
But he added that such a
schedule has logistical ramifications. Longer days would likely put
buses on the road in the middle of rush hour, meaning longer commutes
for students, more time on the road for bus drivers and greater expenses
for operations and driver salaries, he said. Teachers would also have to
be paid more, he said.
"The question is going to
be whether or not the state can afford it," he said.
Joanie Arcement, co-president
of the Gwinnett PTA Council, said school finances aren't the only thing
the longer day could hurt. Student fatigue could also become a problem,
she said.
"Their little brain cells
are going to say 'aiiieeeee, give me a break,' " said Arcement,
whose 12-year-old son attends Shiloh Middle School. "I don't know
if they need more hours, they just need to do better with the time they
have."
Barbara Kriner, principal of
Holcomb Bridge Middle School in Alpharetta, said students have a hard
enough time sitting still on their current school day, which lasts about
7 1/2 hours. She'd prefer a longer school year to a longer school day.
"We end up doing a lot of reteaching the first six weeks," she
said.
Don Doran, principal of
Atlanta's Inman Middle School, said he has no problem with 30 minutes of
additional instruction, and noted that most middle school days extend
past 5 p.m. with after-school programs and extracurricular activities.
But he said a longer school day needs to be structured so that students
are not being force-fed new information all day.
"Kids just don't have that
kind of staying power," Doran said. "You are just getting
diminishing returns as the day extends."
Staff writers Rochelle Carter,
Duane Stanford, Michael Pearson, Henry Farber, Chris Reinolds and Will
Anderson contributed to this article.
Calls for Change in
the Scheduling of the School Day
By JODI WILGOREN, New
York Times, January 10, 2001
The newest educational mantra may as well
be: Never let them leave the building.
Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani of New York
wants Saturday classes. The state's governor, George E. Pataki, says
students should stay in school until after dark. And in California, Gov.
Gray Davis plans to tack 30 days onto the academic year — stretching it
by 17 percent — for middle school students who have fallen behind in an
era of mounting expectations.
The proposals, made in recent days during
the annual parade of politicians' speeches on the state of their
respective domains, add to a mounting sense that America's school schedule
— which was based not on educational needs but on those of an agrarian
economy — should be ripped up and redrawn.
"Our traditional school calendar has
simply outlived its usefulness," said Ruy Teixeira, a senior fellow
at the Century Foundation, a public policy research group based in
Washington that published a paper last summer on the concept of all-day,
all-year schools.
"This ideological limit on what
schools can do and when they can be open is so clearly a remnant of the
past," Mr. Teixeira added. "Twenty years from now, we're going
to look back on the way schools are today and have been for a long time
and think, `How could anyone possibly believe that system would work?'
"
In the last four years, federal financing
for after-school programs has skyrocketed to $846 million from $1 million.
At the same time, millions of schoolchildren have been sent to summer
school: nearly one in five in the nation's large urban districts were in
class last July. Year-round schools, which sprinkle vacations throughout
the year rather than have a long summer break, now serve about 2 million
of the nation's 52 million students. And many of the 2,000 charter schools
that have sprouted across the country since 1990 are luring families in
part by offering longer hours.
Meanwhile, Sandra Feldman, president of
the American Federation of Teachers, has called for a fifth year of high
school for those who are struggling, and Richard W. Riley, the secretary
of education, has suggested making teaching a 12-month job, largely to
make more time for professional development. Teachers' unions generally
support this idea.
The trend is powered by a troika of
sociological forces: more parents working outside the home; research
showing that children get into trouble during the late afternoon and lose
educational ground during summer breaks; and the higher standards that
have been embraced from coast to coast over the last decade.
Support for the more-time movement is
broad and bipartisan, but considerable obstacles include the enormous
price tag and the gaping teacher shortage. Educators and politicians also
caution that more of the same is not necessarily better, and that expanded
calendars must be filled with creative curriculum overseen by qualified
personnel.
The Knowledge Is Power Program in Houston
and the South Bronx, which has won national recognition for high test
scores and has been showcased by President-elect George W. Bush, requires
attendance from 7:25 a.m. until 5 p.m., two or three Saturdays a month,
and several weeks in summer.
"When we started, everyone thought we
were nuts — now everyone wants to do it," said David Levin,
principal of the program's New York outlet. "Excellence requires
sacrifice. That's a value that's essential to be successful in any
endeavor. When you put in all this extra time with kids, they don't get
the sense that you're just punching the clock."
The call for increased time in school
began in 1983 with the landmark "Nation at Risk" report, but the
volume was turned up in 1994 with a pair of papers, by the Department of
Education and the Carnegie Corporation, that focused specifically on the
calendar. "Time should be adjusted to meet the individual needs of
learners," the federal report said, "rather than the
administrative convenience of adults."
Since then, the pressure has only mounted,
as virtually every state has adopted more rigorous curriculums, and many
have introduced tough exit exams. With teachers and principals being held
accountable for results on standardized tests, many have complained that
they cannot cram more into already crowded days.
"We have asked more of our students
and schools than ever before," Governor Davis said in his speech
Monday night. "Educators tell me that for all the new investments
we've made, the main thing they need is more time to teach."
In part, the motivation is international
competition: a 1990-91 study showed that the average number of required
school days in the United States, 178, fell behind that of 16 European and
Asian countries, many of whose students outperform Americans: Italy,
Israel, Germany, Japan, Taiwan and Korea all had more than 200 days; China
had 250.
"If we want American kids to catch up
with kids who learn more in other countries, American kids might need to
spend more time learning like kids in other countries do," said
Chester E. Finn Jr., an education official in the Reagan administration.
Noting that most juvenile crime and
teenage pregnancies occur between 3 and 6 p.m., and that thousands of
children spend those hours parked in front of TV sets, Mr. Finn added,
"For an awful lot of kids, school is a more salubrious environment
than where else they're likely to be spending their time."
But time is money.
Many state legislatures have rejected
proposals to add days after considering the bottom line. The California
plan would cost at least $770 per student per year — or $900 million
annually once it was fully implemented in three grades. Mayor Giuliani's
proposals, to send 45,000 students to weekend science classes, and 45,000
new immigrants to English immersion workshops, would cost an estimated $34
million a year — for only 8 percent of the city's students. Governor
Pataki wants to double his $15 million allocation for after-school
programs, but that would bring the total number of children served to just
40,000.
"It's going to be very expensive, and
we have to be prepared to pay for it," said Diane Ravitch, a pre-
eminent educational historian.
Many politicians and educators believe
that now is the time to try, since states are swimming in surpluses and
the public's interest in education is at an all-time high. But a parallel
problem comes in finding people to fill the classrooms for all those extra
hours. The nation needs 2.5 million teachers by 2010 as it is.
"Whatever you do, you're going to
need the committed, trained and talented people to execute these
reforms," said Mr. Levin of the Knowledge Is Power Program, KIPP.
"The danger is that the reforms themselves could be devalued."
Another debate is over content.
Researchers say the longer day and year should be used to address
students' varied learning styles, and to add enrichment activities, like
theater.
"We don't believe in repeating what
teachers are doing during the day," said Lenore Neier of the Y.M.C.A.
of Greater New York, which runs school-based programs for 11,000 children,
featuring plays and journal writing, among other activities. "It's
literacy made fun."
Jose Hernandez, a KIPP eighth grader, said
he appreciated the Saturday and summer sessions because "you get more
opportunities to learn." As for the politician's proposals,
13-year-old Jose said added time should not be used for recreational
activities that children could do on their own, but for productive ones.
"If," he explained, "it's like anything that could help us
in the future."
Stretching Time for Schools
Longer days,
longer school year may be long overdue
The
Christian Science Monitor
Anyone with school-age kids knows that a
demanding schedule for education - classes, extracurricular activities,
and homework - must run like clockwork.
And yet rarely, does it seem, are there
enough hours to perform all these learning activities well.
Not to worry, say many educators and
governors around the United States. Pushed by public demand to boost
student performance on standardized tests, many schools are making the
obvious adjustment: stretching class periods, school days, and even the
school year.
The old school schedules of a bygone
agrarian era (when children had real chores affecting family livelihood)
are coming up short in the race for quality education.
But will merely increasing time spent at
school bring an increase in learning? It can certainly help - if it's more
than just time that's added.
Some elementary schools in the Washington,
D.C., area have lengthened school days by an extra hour or more to give
students, particularly those falling behind, remedial help with academic
basics. Test scores at these schools have sharply risen.
The governors of California and Georgia
are proposing a longer school year and school day for middle- schoolers,
because the students' test scores have been particularly difficult to
raise. The mayor of New York even wants Saturday classes.
But such quick fixes are rarely that
simple. Teachers need to be enthusiastic participants. And if they put in
more time, their pay needs to go up, with taxpayers footing the bill.
Parents' schedules, including summer vacations, will need adjusting. Above
all, any schedule changes should address the needs of kids themselves. A
less frantic, more thoughtfully paced day would serve them well.
Many schools are reorganizing the school
day into longer "blocks" of time per class, allowing students to
go more in-depth on topics. In Minneapolis, high schools are starting the
school day at 8:40 a.m. instead of 7:15 a.m. Such a later start better
suits the late-to-bed-late-to-rise sleeping habits of most teenagers.
Classes also end a little over an hour later, at 3:10 p.m.
This experiment in Minneapolis may soon
become a model once it becomes clearer that such a schedule shift truly
raises test scores. Some observers already see an improvement in grades.
At the least, kids now generally don't show up for the first morning class
acting like zombies.
It's worth noting that students in other
countries - notably academic powerhouses like Japan and South Korea -
spend many more hours and days at school than US children.
Adding class time for America's youth is
probably long overdue.
|
Some High-School Seniors Find A Lack of Purpose in
Final Year
By JUNE KRONHOLZ
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET
JOURNAL
Copyright 1999. All rights reserved.
ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- Two and a half months
into his senior year at Thomas A. Edison High School last fall, Andy
Wong learned he'd been accepted into the University of Virginia freshman
class for this fall. So, with 26 courses on his transcript -- five more
than he needs to graduate -- he's using his last year of high school to
earn credits toward his first year in college.
Which raises the question: What's the
point of the senior year anyway?
Forget the idea that it's a time to plan
for the future: Huge numbers of kids have that settled even before the
football season is over. The make-or-break SAT college-entrance
examination is in October -- and students now can sign up for it a year
in advance. College acceptance letters start arriving before the leaves
turn: Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., offers seats beginning
in mid-September. Harvard fills more than half its freshman class by
Christmas.
The early-decision process -- in which
colleges give priority acceptances to youngsters who then are committed
to attend -- means growing numbers of high schoolers are locked into a
college decision by December. The College Board says 204 colleges now
offer early decision, and filled 49,000 of their seats that way this
year -- one for every 17 kids going to a four-year college.
A Long, Slow Windup
Forget, too, the idea that the senior
year is a time to summarize or consolidate learning. State exit exams --
which sound like they're meant to test what a youngster has learned in
four years of high school -- are over long before the exit is anywhere
close. New Jersey's exit exam is in the 11th grade, and based on
10th-grade skills. Tennessee's is in the ninth grade, and geared to what
an eighth-grader should know. Indeed, according to educators who monitor
such tests, the only students who take exit exams in the 12th grade are
those who flunked them in earlier grades.
With the emphasis on passing enough
courses to graduate, rather than on taking the right courses to succeed,
enrollment in tough math and science classes drops. Only one in five
seniors takes trigonometry; one in four takes physics. The
government-appointed National Commission on Excellence in Education
recommended years ago that all youngsters take at least four English
classes, three in social studies, and two each in math and science
before they graduate. But 37% of seniors graduate with less than those
minimums, and 23% graduate with just that.
All this means that the senior year has
gradually become a holding tank for thousands of youngsters. Almost one
in four of the country's 2.8 million high-school seniors works 20 hours
a week or more, and these aren't baby-sitting jobs that might allow time
to study. About 25% of those seniors work in food-service jobs; another
quarter work in sales or as cashiers. Laurence Steinberg, a professor of
psychology at Temple University in Philadelphia, studied seniors to see
if they took easier courses when they began working; a third of them
said they did.
Perhaps not surprisingly, 22% of the
students in public four-year colleges take at least one
remedial-education course in their first year. When Public Agenda, an
independent polling organization, asked if recent high-school graduates
had the skills they needed to succeed in college or at work, 68% of
employers and 52% of professors said no.
Also forget the idea that the senior
year is a time to develop leadership or demonstrate responsibility.
Whether out of boredom or rebellion, 91% of seniors cut school now and
then, the Department of Education says. "They're moving on, and
they start a little early," says Janice Dreis, a senior-class
adviser at New Trier Township High in Winnetka, Ill.
About 60% of seniors concede that they
spend fewer than six hours on homework every week, while 40% say they
spend at least three hours every day watching television. Lots of
seniors tell researchers they regularly read for pleasure, go to church,
take music lessons and spend time with their parents. But 27% also admit
that they had at least five drinks in a row during some night over the
past two weeks.
Finally, forget the idea that it's
necessarily the kids who are to blame for the senior-year malaise.
Record numbers of seniors are finding their courses so unchallenging
that they're signing up for advanced-placement, or AP, classes, which
earn them college credits while they're still in high school. The
University of Michigan in Ann Arbor says that 80% of its freshmen arrive
with some college credits. The University of North Carolina in Chapel
Hill says it has admitted youngsters with as many as 48 college credits
-- enough to make them second-semester sophomores before they ever set
foot on campus.
Radical Rethinking
All this is prompting some schools to
rethink the senior year. Affluent, hyper-achieving New Trier, where
almost everyone goes on to college, still finds that "we have
seniors dying on the vine," says Mrs. Dries. So, beginning six
years ago, New Trier gave seniors the option of spending the last four
weeks of school on a senior project that undergoes a jury evaluation and
is exhibited for the whole school to see. Last year's seniors, among
other things, cataloged fish for the Field Museum, shadowed a police
officer, studied Farsi, planned a golf tournament and practiced for a
trumpet recital.
Central Park East Secondary, a New York
public school, requires that its seniors take a course at City College
to graduate from high school, and complete a 100-hour internship at such
neighboring institutions as the Museum of Modern Art, the police station
or Mount Sinai Hospital (the morgue is a popular assignment).
A group of high schools around Ithaca,
N.Y., encourages students with an interest in medicine to spend their
senior year at the local hospital. The high schools base teachers at the
hospital for English and other required courses; seniors spend the rest
of the day with professional mentors. "It makes the curriculum
really relevant," says Katrin Turek, assistant superintendent of
the Ithaca schools.
Vito Perrone, director of teacher
education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, says educators
have talked for years about remodeling the senior year to require a
project or recital or internship -- "something that matters,"
he says.
Beyond that, parents often battle
anything that would make their kids' high-school curriculum different
from anyone else's. Harvard professor Janine Bempechat remembers the
scuffle when she advised a Connecticut high school to switch to block
scheduling -- that is, offering math and English two hours a day for one
semester each, rather than one hour a day for two semesters each.
Fearing some undefined disadvantage on the SAT or in college admission,
"the parents went nuts," says Ms. Bempechat.
An Ending With Few
Surprises
At Thomas Edison High here in suburban
Washington, D.C., springtime graduation rituals are gathering speed on a
recent day, even as a winter snowstorm rages outside. There's a poll
under way to choose prom colors. But, for most seniors here, that's
about the extent of the surprises. The theme for the June 22 graduation
party is set: A city recreation center will be decorated to look like a
cruise ship. A senior-class beach week follows that, and motel
reservations already are in. And most who are college-bound have known
for weeks, if not months, where they'll be attending school next fall.
Edison is a sprawling place, built in
the 1960s to school the early baby boomers. Remodeled and enlarged, it's
now educating the record numbers of kids the record number of boomers
produced. Edison's 1,420 students aren't much different from those at
many suburban schools: Half of them are minorities, 30% qualify for free
lunches because of family income, 6% are learning English as a second
language, 12% are in special education. Their SAT scores were just below
the national average last year, nicely above it this year. Just over
half go on to four-year colleges.
Andy Wong, who took early decision from
the University of Virginia at Charlottesville to study engineering,
settled his future sooner than most of his Edison classmates. Still, the
once-common practice of universities sending out their acceptances in
April is long past. Brianna Wilkins, who plans to study government and
law, heard from the University of Michigan and Michigan State in
December. Rosalia Gaytan, who dreams of opening a pastry shop, was
accepted into a culinary course at the College of Mexico in Mexico City
in early February.
"By the senior year, you already
know where you're going to go and what you're going to do," says
John Francis, who has been accepted by the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy
in Kings Point, N.Y. That means that motivating kids who already have
one foot in the future can be problematic. "Kids who start out the
year pumped somehow get distracted," says Luther Fennell, who has
been a principal for 27 years, seven of them at Edison.
Most colleges demand final grades from
graduating seniors to prevent a slide, and can revoke an admission. But
Esther Ramirios, assistant director of admissions at Purdue, says that
for that to happen "you'd have to completely screw up: not go to
class, not turn in homework, change drastically." Jerome Lucido,
director of admissions at North Carolina, says he has canceled
admissions only "a handful of times," and then more often for
things like cheating or being convicted of a crime.
Things could change for some future
seniors when Virginia's tough new standardized tests become mandatory
for graduation in the year 2004. But in any event, students will take
them at the end of certain courses beginning in the ninth grade, and
could finish all six required tests before their senior year.
Exit tests and final reports aren't
necessary for high achievers, of course. "We stay motivated because
that's the way we're brought up," says Brianna Wilkins, who is
senior-class president, takes three advanced-placement classes,
volunteers at a hospital, plays softball and works at a pizza parlor 35
hours a week. "You work hard because there's always somebody out
there who wants your spot," adds John Francis, who should know --
he wants a spot at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md.
Few kids are that focused, though. Oscar
Molina, who leaves for the Marine Corps four days after graduation, says
he regularly vows "to bring my grades up, and then the next day I
see myself slacking again." As the year winds down, "our
marginal students become more marginal," says Lonnie Lowery, head
of attendance and discipline. Absences increase, discipline frays.
"They act out of character," he says. Michael Graham, who
wants to attend St. Paul's College in Lawrenceville, Va., and eventually
open a kennel, smiles slyly at the mention of hooky -- "a senior
obligation," he insists.
With their focus already straying,
seniors then compound the problem by taking jobs. Tony Rugari, a
senior-class adviser, tells the youngsters not to work while they're in
school. "Most can't do it," he says. But so many try that
Edison is giving academic credit to Trent Conklin for working 35 hours a
week at a grocery store, and Christina Manning for working 40 hours a
week at McDonald's -- something it calls cooperative learning.
Educators who try to explain why U.S.
teenagers score so poorly on international math and science tests claim
it's partly because they spend so much time at work instead of studying.
The National Research Council says 53% of U.S. teenagers hold jobs,
compared with 17% of Japanese teens and 7% in France. The National
Restaurant Association says that 1.5 million of the country's 10.5
million restaurant workers are 18 or younger.
Christina Manning, who talks of working
in an office after graduation, concedes that her McDonald's job allows
little time for studying, even though she leaves school early to go to
work, and that she has taken only as many courses as she absolutely must
to graduate. She needs the money, she says -- she pays $50 a week to her
family for room and board.
The notion of high-school seniors
holding jobs to raise college tuition or help with the family bills is
largely a false one, though. Suburban kids, presumably more affluent
than others, work more often and longer hours than do city youngsters,
the Department of Education says. It adds that 80% of seniors use
"none or only a little" of their earnings to help with family
expenses, and other studies find that only four in 10 save any of it for
college.
After 10 months on the job, Trent
Conklin admits he has saved only "a couple hundred" dollars
toward his tuition at Northern Virginia Community College in Fairfax
County. "I blew a lot in trying to have fun," he says. Adds
Oscar Molina, the future Marine: "We throw our money away -- we're
kids. But we're learning."
-------------
Subscribers can search
the archives of The Wall Street Journal for stories. You will
not be charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one.
School year may be extended
Friday December 15, 2000
By The
Associated Press
The state Board of
Education wants to extend the academic year for public schools.
Saying students
don't get enough classroom days, the board on Thursday instructed state
schools Superintendent David Stewart to develop a legislative proposal for
board members to examine at their Jan. 11 meeting. The proposal would add
instructional days to the state's annual 180-day school calendar.
"We need more
time for teachers with students. The time has gotten shorter and shorter,
with teachers having to spend days in Faculty Senate and on other
things,'' said state board member Jim McKnight of Pleasants County.
"In the end,
the school year gets to be like 160 days instead of 180 days. How do you
learn that way?'' McKnight said.
Stewart agreed,
saying research has shown that most states require more than 180 days.
"I think we
need more time. Children need more instructional time than they're
getting,'' he said.
However, Stewart
said he's not sure how many additional days he'll propose.
Adding days to the
school year would require legislative approval because the additional days
would have to be funded.
Also, Stewart and
board members said such a decision would likely need the consent of the
West Virginia Education Association and the West Virginia Federation of
Teachers, the state's two largest teachers unions.
"I never said
[adding school days] would be a popular move, but I do believe it's the
right one,'' said state board member Jim MacCallum of Boone County.
During Thursday's
meeting, a report showed that 16 of the state's 55 county school systems
are not fully approved by the state's Office of Education Performance
Audits.
Full approval is
given to a county school system which meets or exceeds "high quality
standards for student, school and school system performance.''
Fourteen county
systems received either temporary or conditional approval status, which
means they are working on improvement plans that could lead to full
approval. Those counties are Cabell, Fayette, Boone, Grant, Hardy, Lewis,
Logan, McDowell, Nicholas, Pendleton, Raleigh, Wayne, Wirt and Wyoming.
Lincoln and Mingo
counties are considered in "nonapproval'' status, which means the
counties must address severe deficiencies.
The report was
conducted through surprise visits to schools by state inspectors.
Forty counties'
systems were fully approved in 1999, one more than in 2000. But state
officials say standards were tougher in 2000 because officials increased
their emphasis on evaluation.
The state took over
the Mingo County school system in 1998 and the Lincoln County system last
year.
Kenna Seal,
director of the performance audits office, told board members that only 49
schools statewide failed to meet the minimum standards for the Stanford 9
standardized achievement test, down from 64 schools in 1999 and 98 in
1998.
On the net: http://wvde.state.wv.us
Too many high school
seniors major in wasting time, commission reports
Andrew Mollison
-
Cox Washington Bureau
Thursday, January 18, 2001
Washington --- High schools and parents let many seniors waste their last
year of school, which helps explain why one-third to one-half aren't
adequately prepared for college or the workplace, a report submitted
Wednesday to Education Secretary Richard Riley concludes.
''Many students reported 'ditching' senior
classes because the atmosphere encouraged them to consider the senior year
a farewell tour of adolescence and school,'' said the report from Riley's
National Commission on the High School Senior Year.
''I have heard too many college leaders
describe the senior year of high school as a wasteland,'' Riley said.
''Many high school seniors literally check out, others spend more time
working than going to school, and too many young people do not get the
help they need (in choosing their courses) to make well-informed judgments
about life after high school.''
The commission said many seniors
apparently don't realize ''a high school diploma is no longer a guarantee
of success in either postsecondary education or the world of work.''
About 30 percent of today's college-bound
seniors have to take remedial courses in college, and many of those going
directly into the work force find out they can't get jobs that would ever
pay enough to support a family.
Unlike their counterparts in many other
countries, American seniors are more likely to hold down a job than to
take courses in science or math. ''When push comes to shove, low-skilled,
part-time jobs that earn students spending money appear to be far more
important than school,'' the report said.
Stephen Portch, chancellor of the
University System of Georgia, has served on Riley's commission and has
preached to Gov. Roy Barnes' Education Reform Study Commission about the
problem for more than a year.
Echoing the report, Portch said there is a
kind of collusion between many seniors and their parents: Parents don't
mind their sons and daughters having light schedules during the last year
because that lets them work to make money for college.
Top colleges add to the problem by
accepting many students by October of their senior year, Portch said.
"What does that say to students?"
The lack of focus on academics in the
senior year may be one of the reasons more than half of Georgia's HOPE
scholars are unable to maintain a B average in their freshman year of
college and lose the scholarship, he said.
Portch has advocated that Georgia move to
a single, more rigorous high school diploma requirement that would force
students to continue taking tough classes into their senior year.
Currently, students can earn college-prep or technical track diplomas. In
both cases, students can finish most of their key classes before their
senior year.
Many of the seniors or recent seniors
interviewed by the commission said they were ''too bored'' to do much in
school during their final year.
At one extreme, Riley said, are the
poor-performing students who ''haven't learned to read well, to read
critically, so they are really bored.''
At the other extreme are high-performing
students who finish their required courses before or during their junior
year and say they don't feel challenged anymore, said the commission's
vice chairman, Jacquelyn Belcher, president of Georgia Perimeter College
in Decatur.
Last semester, the community college tried
to combat boredom among those students by accepting 900 high school
students from the metropolitan Atlanta area in a dual-enrollment program.
They take a mix of college-level and high school courses.
Amanda Seals, a spokeswoman for Georgia
School Superintendent Linda Schrenko, said the state has taken steps to
combat senior slacking. It added a year of math to the college prep
curriculum, encouraged students to take more Advance Placement courses and
pays for them to take the PSAT before they take the SAT.
The 33 officials, dignitaries and
researchers named to the national commission last September by Riley
include Houston schools superintendent Rod Paige, designated by
President-elect George W. Bush to be Riley's successor as education
secretary.
Staff writer James Salzer contributed to
this report.
Top high school seniors
slacking off out of boredom, report says
01/18/2001
Associated Press
WASHINGTON – Even smart students are
slacking off during their senior years in high school, the government said
Wednesday in the last study released by outgoing Education Secretary
Richard Riley.
"Our high schools haven't necessarily
changed, but the world has changed," Mr. Riley said at a news
conference to cap his eight years as head of the Education Department.
"At this level, we should be more committed to our children, not
less."
The report, by a panel appointed by Mr.
Riley and including Education Secretary-designate Rod Paige, suggests that
high schools are neglecting 12th-graders and that those students are
neglecting classes.
The panel based its conclusions on
existing research and student interviews and offered few solutions in the
first of its two reports. It concluded that mass boredom afflicts students
who have gained early college admission just as much as students who are
on the brink of dropping out.
Researchers who interviewed seniors last
fall said college-bound students often have too few classes to occupy
them; others, not urged to take advanced classes once they've gained the
minimum credits for diplomas, focus on outside work.
A student named Eunice said: "By
senior year, I was done with math. I was done with history. ... I was just
taking a bunch of classes I didn't need."
A student named Kyle complained that
teachers, "would help the advanced people, or superior people. But
below that, it was kind of like, 'Whatever.'"
But statistics showing fewer seniors in
high school classes could be misleading, said Cynthia Rudrud, principal of
Cactus High School in Glendale, Ariz.
"Students might have a reduced course
load in the high school their senior year because they are enrolled in
community college courses or doing internships," said Ms. Rudrud, who
estimates that 40 percent of her school's 400 seniors take a full load of
high school classes. "There is a point when seniors realize they are
beyond high school. It's not that they shut down, but that they are ready
to move on."
The trouble with students avoiding or
skipping classes or even entire school days, the panel said, is that many
are not taking the courses they need to get the best jobs or stay afloat
in college.
For example, one-third of high school
seniors take no math courses; two-thirds skip science. And 13 percent of
students at private four-year colleges need remedial courses.
"No one ... can afford to squander
one-quarter of a high school education," said Kentucky Gov. Paul
Patton, panel chairman. "We have to get beyond the notion that high
school is the end of learning."
Mr. Patton, who has formed a state task
force to examine student learning from preschool to college, said he hears
from employers who have to retrain high school graduates for today's
demanding, technology-savvy jobs.
"At a time when mechanics use
sophisticated computerized diagnostic programs to tell what's wrong with a
car engine, when assembly lines are populated by robots, every student
needs every day of high school to get ready for adult life," he said.
Even the movement toward higher standards
and increased testing hasn't guaranteed complete success for high
schoolers, panel members said. In most of the 19 states where students
must pass tests for high-school diplomas, they are being tested only on
lessons learned in ninth or 10th grade.
National and international tests show that
older U.S. students score lower than children in earlier grades.
Mr. Riley proposed that high school
campuses be smaller to monitor student activity, that teachers in advanced
subjects such as math and science get more training, and that the intense
reading instruction usually offered to elementary school pupils be
extended to middle and high school students.
Panel members said that Mr. Paige had
reviewed the report and said that he would support the group's continued
research. He is expected to be confirmed by the Senate as early as next
week.
Statewide High School Report Proposes Longer Year
Tougher high school graduation requirements,
longer school days, longer school years and limiting the number of
students per teacher are among the recommendations in a report on a
15-month study that focused on improving Iowa's high schools.
The study was conducted by
the Urban Education Network, a coalition of the state's eight largest
school districts. Those districts, including Council Bluffs and Sioux
City, enroll 25 percent of Iowa's students and 75 percent of the state's
minority students.
"Major reports such
as this often strike a nerve," Arlis Swartzendruber, superintendent
of the Waterloo School District, said Thursday. "The study serves as
a vision, not a road map or blueprint."
Politicians' education
focus most often has been on younger children. It's widely accepted that
early development is essential to making a student successful.
Swartzendruber said his
group decided it was time to examine high schools, and it quickly became
apparent that improvement is needed.
"It's high time to
pay attention to the high school time," he said.
Major recommendations
include:
Establishing a 12-month calendar for high schools. While not all students
would go to class year-round, some who needed help would face longer
school years and longer days for programs such as after-school tutoring.
Creating new "exit-level performance standards" for graduating
seniors. That doesn't necessarily mean new testing requirements.
"There are ways to measure performance beyond a pencil-and-paper
test," Swartzendruber said.
Establishing a class structure in which teachers are responsible for no
more than 90 students per term [down from the current 150].
Adding flexibility to school schedules.
Improving teacher evaluation efforts, linking teaching effectiveness with
teacher contracts.
Moving to "review and align" high school graduation
requirements, working with higher education officials. No details of those
new requirements were offered.
[
Offering students up to five years to obtain a high school diploma without
having to attend an alternative high school.
Abandoning the traditional method of awarding high school credit.]
Iowa City Schools
Superintendent Lane Plugge, who is the head of the eight-district group,
said the study report was intended to be simply a guide for all schools to
contemplate as they do self-evaluation.
"During the past
year, we developed this report, which is comprehensive and provides a
solid framework for all school districts as they consider the
effectiveness and ponder any changes to their high schools," Plugge
said.
Jolene Franken, head of
the state teachers union, said the study "has established a solid
information base from which this effort can begin."
Coalition members are
Cedar Rapids, Council Bluffs, Davenport, Des Moines, Dubuque, Iowa City,
Sioux City and Waterloo. [The report is named, "Redefinition of
High School: A Vision for Iowa." Proposals in the 130-page
report are nearly identical to ones made by the National
Association of Secondary School Principals in its 1996
report.]
|