Jerry Moore's S-G Commentary & Information Pages Home myshortpencil.com Home Page
Search for
This Site
The Web

Want your article published?  Need help posting messages?  Send email to Jerry.

 

2005 4th & 8th Grade ELA & Math Results (NY)

Updated 19 Aug 2006

Prior Years' Data:
1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004

Resources:

2005 - NYSED English Language Arts Test Press Release
2005 - NYSED ELA Database & PowerPoint Files
S-G's Middling 2005 ELA Results
Commentary on Area 2005 ELA Results
2005 - NYSED Math Test Press Release
S-G's Ambiguous 2005 Math Results

Bonus:

2005 NAEP & NY Scores Compared

Awards:

BEST K-8 English Language Program:  Niskayuna and Bethlehem
MOST IMPROVED K-8 English Language Program:  Schuylerville and Cornith

BEST K-8 Math Program: Niskayuna and Burnt-Hills
MOST IMPROVED K-8 Math Program: Schuylerville and Mechanicville
Honorable Mention for Math & English: Edinburg (an elementary-only school)

TABLES AND CHARTS

Summary Data
Percentage of NY Schools Having Higher Scores Than S-G
S-G Math & English Scores
S-G Ranking Among 41 Capital District Schools

ELA Results
Capital District Performance on the 4th-Grade ELA Exam
2005 4th-Grade ELA School District Rankings
Table of Various ELA-4 Rankings Based on Pass Rates
Table of Various ELA-4 Rankings Based on Top Performance
Table of Improvement on the ELA-4 Exam
Area ELA-4 Grade Point Average with High, Low & S-G
Capital District Performance on the 8th-Grade ELA Exam
2005 8th-Grade ELA School District Rankings
Table of Various ELA-8 Rankings Based on Pass Rates
Table of Various ELA-8 Rankings Based on Top Performance
Table of Improvement on the ELA-8 Exam
Area ELA-8 Grade Point Average with High, Low & S-G

Math Results
Capital District Performance on the 4th-Grade Math Exam
2005 4th-Grade Math School District Rankings
Table of Various Math-4 Rankings Based on Pass Rates
Table of Various Math-4 Rankings Based on Top Performance
Table of Improvement on the Math-4 Exam
Area Math-4 Grade Point Average with High, Low & S-G
Capital District Performance on the 8th-Grade Math Exam
2005 8th-Grade Math School District Rankings
Table of Various Math-8 Rankings Based on Pass Rates
Table of Various Math-8 Rankings Based on Top Performance
Table of Improvement on the Math-8 Exam
Area Math-8 Grade Point Average with High, Low & S-G

A Final Graphic
Area GPA for All 4 Exams with High, Low & S-G

 

Percentage of NY Schools Having Higher Scores Than S-G
Still think S-G is the Blue Ribbon National School of Excellence it was in the early '90s?
Score 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
4th ELA Mean 39% 34% 40% 30% 17%
(best ever)
4th ELA Top Level 34% 38% 38% 29% 13%
(best ever)
4th Math Mean 42%
(tied for worst)
34%
(best ever)
40% 42%
4th Math Top Level 40% 34%
(best ever)
45% 45%
8th ELA Mean 40% 40% 45% 30%
(best ever)
33%
8th ELA Top Level 60%
(worst ever)
42% 58% 53% 33%
(best ever)
8th Math Mean 24%
(best ever)
31% 32% 35%
8th Math Top Level* 37%
(worst ever)
25% 28% 24%
(best ever)

* Note: S-G eighth graders who take 8th grade math in 7th grade--about 10% of the class-- do not take the 8th grade math exam until the 8th grade.

S-G Math & English Scores
Grades 8 and 4
1999-2005
RED: Fails to meet standards

Shaded areas are the same graduating class.

Level 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Math8 1

11 12 12 10 6 5 3
2 32 24 27 29 29 26 20
3 44 48 48 45 53 52 68
4 12 16 13 16 12 17 9
English8 1 2 7 6 3 5 3 2
2 30 40 38 49 50 45 43
3 51 41 44 39 41 41 50
4 16 12 12 9 4 11 5
Math4 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 2
2 13 10 11 18 15 8 5
3 50 62 53 54 52 56 50
4 36 27 36 27 31 35 43
English4 1 0 1 4 2 4 2 4
2 30 14 17 19 21 24 19
3 59 50 49 51 50 58 53
4 11 35 30 28 25 16 24

In addition to showing S-G's performance on state exams, the table above permits a comparison of the performance of 8th graders in 2003-2005 with their 1999-2001 4th grade performance.  Based on 2003 scores, by 8th grade three-quarters of our best English students and two-thirds of our best math students had been normalized.  Based on 2004 scores, by 8th grade we lost 70% of our top performing English students and 37% of our top performing math students.  

Score attrition between 4th and 8th grade became worse in 2005.  30% of our 4th graders scored in the top level on the 2001 ELA exam, but by 2005 only 5% did.  36% of 4th graders earned the top score in 2001, but on the 2005 8th-grade math exam only 9% earned the top score.  This trend is a direct result of the district's practice of teaching to the middle with an emphasis on the Level 1's and 2's.  Our best performing students are being under-challenged and basically ignored because of an entrenched ideology to equalize students rather than provide every student with the opportunities needed for her/his greatest success.

 

S-G Ranking Among 41 Capital District Schools

Score/ Year

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

4th Grade Mean

20

17

22

18

12

8

11

4th Grade Top Level

19

15

22

16

11

10

13

8th Grade Mean

18

22

26

21

14

14

14

8th Grade Top Level

25

20

27

15

16

10

11

4th-GRADE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS

In the above chart, I answer the question, "How has the number of students performing in each level changed over time, assuming the same number of students took the exam each year?"  The number of students performing in each of the levels for 2005 are the actual numbers.  For prior years, the number of students performing in each level reflects the number of students who would have been placed in each level had the same number of students taken the test as in 2005.  I calculate these numbers using the percentages provided by the state for each performance level.  

Interpretation of Performance Levels:

Level 4 – exceeds the standards
Level 3 – meets all the standards
Level 2 – meets some of the standards or partially meets the standards
Level 1 – shows serious academic difficulties.

The above chart shows the percentage of students scoring in each level in each of the 42 NY capital district public schools with elementary schools.  The schools are arranged in order of the percentage of students passing the exam (scoring at Level 3 or 4) from most to least.  Scotia-Glenville is in 21st place and its score is outlined in red.

The following table shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year rankings of capital district schools based on the percentage of students passing the 4th-grade ELA exam.  The more years averaged into the ranking, the better Scotia-Glenville does.  That's because relative to other schools, its performance has been declining over time.  This will become more apparent in a later graphic.

Table of Various Rankings Based on ELA-4 Pass Rates

 
Rank Name Percent Passing 2005 Name Average Percent Passing 2003-2005 Name Average Percent Passing 2000-2005
1 Edinburg 100 Niskayuna 87.5 Maplewood 87.4
2 Menands 95 Bethlehem 85.3 Bethlehem 86.7
3 Schuylerville 89.6 Voorheesville 84.3 Niskayuna 86.7
4 Niskayuna 88.5 Maplewood 83.3 Voorheesville 85.2
5 Burnt Hills 87.5 Schuylerville 83.3 Edinburg 84.6
6 Duanesburg 87.5 Burnt Hills 82.9 Burnt Hills 83.0
7 Bethlehem 87.4 G. Island 82.8 N. Colonie 81.7
8 Maplewood 86.7 E. Greenbush 81.9 Menands 80.8
9 Voorheesville 86.4 Edinburg 80.6 S. Glens Falls 80.1
10 E. Greenbush 85.5 Averill P. 79.9 Averill P. 79.9
11 S. Glens Falls 85.3 Saratoga 79.7 Schuylerville 79.7
12 Saratoga 84.4 N. Colonie 79.2 E. Greenbush 78.9
13 Averill P. 83.8 S. Glens Falls 79.0 Saratoga 78.8
14 Guilderland 82.4 Menands 78.7 Scotia-Glenville 78.2
15 G. Island 82.1 Guilderland 76.8 Guilderland 77.8
16 S. Colonie 81 S. Colonie 76.7 Shenendehowa 76.9
17 Shenendehowa 80.7 Shenendehowa 75.5 Schodack 76.8
18 Stillwater 80.5 Cornith 75.4 S. Colonie 75.4
19 N. Colonie 79 Scotia-Glenville 75.1 Stillwater 74.7
20 Ballston Spa 78.2 Waterford 74.9 Brunswick 72.9
21 Scotia-Glenville 77.3 Stillwater 74.5 Duanesburg 72.4
22 Galway 75.9 Schodack 73.9 Waterford 71.3
23 Schodack 75.7 Duanesburg 73.4 Galway 70.8
24 Cornith 74.3 Galway 72.7 Wynantskill 70.5
25 Cohoes 74.1 Schalmont 71.3 G. Island 69.9
26 Schalmont 73.1 Brunswick 70.6 Ballston Spa 68.1
27 H. Valley 72 Ballston Spa 70.0 Cornith 68.0
28 Mechanicville 71.2 H. Valley 69.0 Schalmont 67.8
29 Mohonasen 68.5 Berne-Knox 67.2 H. Valley 67.3
30 Lansingburgh 66.8 Wynantskill 64.8 Mohonasen 66.0
31 Berne-Knox 66.2 Mohonasen 62.9 Mechanicville 65.2
32 Brunswick 65.7 Cohoes 62.6 Berne-Knox 64.2
33 Ravena 64.4 Mechanicville 61.9 Cohoes 61.7
34 Waterford 64.2 H. Falls 61.3 Ravena 60.9
35 H. Falls 62.4 Watervliet 58.4 H. Falls 60.6
36 Berlin 62.2 Ravena 58.0 Berlin 57.4
37 Rensselaer 61.2 Berlin 57.2 Watervliet 56.2
38 Troy 53.9 Lansingburgh 57.2 Lansingburgh 56.1
39 Schenectady 53.7 Troy 50.8 Troy 54.4
40 Albany 53 Schenectady 48.7 Rensselaer 48.3
41 Wynantskill 52 Albany 48.0 Schenectady 47.3
42 Watervliet 50 Rensselaer 48.0 Albany 46.0
AVERAGE 75.0   71.1   70.9

The following table shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year rankings of the schools based on the percentage of students performing in Level 4, the top level.  In 2005, S-G had a higher percentage of students scoring in Level 4 compared to its 3-year average but a lower percentage compared to its 6-year average.  This indicates an inconsistent ability to move students into the top performance level.  Schuylerville, on the other hand, shows an improving ability to move students into the top performance level.  In 2005, it had 36.8% of its students performing at this level, compared to 26.6% for its 2003 to 2005 average and 22.2% for its 2000 to 2005 average.

Table of Various Rankings Based on ELA-4 Top Performance

 
Rank Name Top Performance 2005 Name Top Performance 2003-2005 Name Top Performance 2000-2005
1 Edinburg 77.8 G. Island 41.9 Bethlehem 33.9
2 G. Island 50 Edinburg 37.0 Niskayuna 33.6
3 Schuylerville 36.8 Menands 32.1 Voorheesville 31.0
4 E. Greenbush 34.6 Niskayuna 31.8 Menands 30.7
5 Ballston Spa 34.1 Saratoga 30.9 G. Island 30.4
6 Bethlehem 34 Voorheesville 30.2 Burnt Hills 29.6
7 Niskayuna 32.5 Bethlehem 29.9 N. Colonie 29.4
8 Saratoga 31.7 Maplewood 28.2 Edinburg 29.1
9 Menands 30 E. Greenbush 28.0 Saratoga 28.7
10 Voorheesville 29.6 Cornith 26.9 Maplewood 28.2
11 Burnt Hills 29.4 Averill P. 26.6 E. Greenbush 27.9
12 N. Colonie 28.5 Schuylerville 26.6 Scotia-Glenville 26.5
13 Cohoes 25.9 Burnt Hills 25.7 Averill P. 26.2
14 Stillwater 25.3 N. Colonie 25.7 Stillwater 25.5
15 Guilderland 24.8 Ballston Spa 25.7 Guilderland 25.1
16 Shenendehowa 24.7 Stillwater 23.9 Ballston Spa 24.3
17 Averill P. 24.5 S. Colonie 22.7 Schodack 24.0
18 Scotia-Glenville 24.5 Guilderland 22.5 Shenendehowa 23.7
19 S. Glens Falls 22.5 S. Glens Falls 22.4 S. Colonie 23.4
20 Cornith 21.9 Waterford 22.2 S. Glens Falls 22.6
21 Duanesburg 21.9 Shenendehowa 21.8 Schuylerville 22.2
22 Schalmont 21.9 Scotia-Glenville 21.8 Brunswick 20.9
23 Maplewood 20 Schodack 21.0 Galway 20.7
24 H. Valley 20 Schalmont 20.0 Wynantskill 19.5
25 Schodack 19.6 Galway 19.2 Waterford 18.9
26 Galway 19.5 Cohoes 18.5 H. Valley 18.1
27 S. Colonie 19 Duanesburg 17.5 Cornith 18.0
28 Berlin 16.2 H. Valley 17.0 Schalmont 17.7
29 Mechanicville 14.9 Brunswick 16.8 Duanesburg 17.6
30 Ravena 13.6 Berne-Knox 13.9 Mechanicville 17.2
31 Berne-Knox 12.2 Berlin 13.9 Cohoes 16.5
32 Waterford 11.9 Ravena 13.2 Berne-Knox 15.9
33 Mohonasen 11.6 Wynantskill 13.1 Ravena 15.8
34 Brunswick 11.4 Watervliet 12.7 Mohonasen 15.3
35 Albany 10.7 Mechanicville 12.7 Berlin 12.4
36 H. Falls 10.4 Mohonasen 12.6 Watervliet 11.5
37 Watervliet 10 H. Falls 12.3 H. Falls 10.9
38 Troy 9.6 Lansingburgh 11.0 Troy 10.6
39 Rensselaer 8.9 Albany 10.0 Lansingburgh 10.3
40 Schenectady 8.3 Troy 9.7 Albany 10.0
41 Wynantskill 5.8 Schenectady 7.2 Schenectady 8.3
42 Lansingburgh 5.6 Rensselaer 5.8 Rensselaer 6.0
  22.5   21.0   21.1

The next table answers the questions, "Which schools are making the most improvement and how much improvement are they making?"  This chart uses all 7 years of ELA scores.  I average the percentage of students passing the exams in each school for 1999 and 2000 and compare them to the average of the percentage of students passing the exams in each school for 2004 and 2005.  This can be interpreted as an analysis of improvement over 3 years.

On average, schools have added 6.1 points to the percentage of students passing the 4th grade ELA exam.  Schools that had above average pass rates for 1999-2000 have added an average of 1.6 points to the percentage of students passing the exam.  Schools with below average pass rates for 1999-2000 have added an average of 10.4 points to their pass rates.  Factors that can cause improvements in scores (here) include:

bullet

Changes in state learning standards.

bullet

Changes in state achievement standards.  These define the levels of proficiency.

bullet

Changes in exam difficulty, content and/or format.

bullet

Changes in grading rubrics.

bullet

Changes in the degree of exam similarity from year to year.

bullet

Changes in grade-level retention rates.

bullet

Students moving into better performing school districts

bullet

Changes in scale score conversions or in cut-off scores

bullet

Improvements in gaming the test, including institutionalized cheating.

bullet

Changes in the level of information about what will be on the test (test-content intelligence).

bullet

Improved instruction/learning from increasing classroom time spent on math, using math across the curriculum, improved teaching techniques from professional development, after-school classes, better assessments of students' strengths and weaknesses and more individual help.

Scotia-Glenville ranks 36th in "improvement."  In fact, the percentage of students passing the 4th-grade ELA has actually declined by 2 points, compared to a 1.6 point average increase for schools with above average pass rates in 1999 and 2000.

Table of Improvement on the ELA-4 Exam

Rank Name Point Improvement to Pass Rate 2004 & 2005 Average Percentage Passing 1999 & 2000 Average Percentage Passing
1 G. Island 41.6 81.1 39.5
2 Schuylerville 22.7 87.2 64.5
3 Stillwater 18.0 79.0 61.0
4 E. Greenbush 17.4 84.9 67.5
5 Cornith 16.8 73.8 57.0
6 Cohoes 16.1 63.6 47.5
7 Schalmont 13.3 71.8 58.5
8 S. Colonie 12.2 77.2 65.0
9 Edinburg 12.0 87.5 75.5
10 Rensselaer 12.0 52.0 40.0
11 Ballston Spa 10.7 71.7 61.0
12 H. Valley 10.6 70.6 60.0
13 Albany 10.2 48.7 38.5
14 Berne-Knox 8.7 66.2 57.5
15 Schenectady 8.3 49.3 41.0
16 Averill P. 7.8 78.4 70.5
17 S. Glens Falls 7.4 84.4 77.0
18 Saratoga 7.3 81.4 74.0
19 Watervliet 7.1 52.6 45.5
20 Niskayuna 6.9 89.4 82.5
21 Burnt Hills 6.0 84.0 78.0
22 Mechanicville 5.0 64.0 59.0
23 Maplewood 4.8 86.9 82.0
24 Troy 4.7 49.7 45.0
25 Bethlehem 3.8 87.3 83.5
26 Galway 3.4 70.9 67.5
27 Waterford 3.3 68.3 65.0
28 H. Falls 2.8 59.9 57.0
29 Shenendehowa 2.3 76.3 74.0
30 N. Colonie 2.1 79.1 77.0
31 Lansingburgh 2.1 56.1 54.0
32 Guilderland 1.5 78.0 76.5
33 Mohonasen -0.3 63.7 64.0
34 Ravena -1.0 59.1 60.0
35 Voorheesville -1.4 84.1 85.5
36 Scotia-Glenville -2.0 75.5 77.5
37 Berlin -2.3 56.8 59.0
38 Duanesburg -4.3 75.2 79.5
39 Schodack -7.0 72.5 79.5
40 Brunswick -10.0 66.5 76.5
41 Wynantskill -11.6 56.5 68.0
42 Menands -14.5 78.1 92.5
AVERAGE 6.1 71.4 65.3
Average improvement in scores for schools above average in 1999/2000 1.6    
Average improvement in scores for schools below average in 1999/2000 10.4    

The following graphic shows the grade point average for the capital district, which has been calculated by summing the scores for all pupils and finding the average by awarding 0.55 for Level 1, 1.7 for Level 2, 2.85 for Level 3 and 4.0 for Level 4.  The area GPA is then compared to the area low, the area high and Scotia-Glenville's GPA.  The graph clearly shows that S-G has moved away from the best performing schools with scores nearly equaling the average for our area.

8th-GRADE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS

The above graphic shows that performance on the 8th-grade ELA exam has declined since 1999, with 4,213 students not meeting state standards in 1999 compared to 4,629 in 2005.  Whenever the Commissioner talks about 8th-grade ELA results, he generally makes his comparisons to 2001, the year of worst performance.  What the Commissioner never talks about is how the cut-off and scale scores on this exam have been changed since that time to make the exam easier to pass.  See, e.g., NY Makes Huge Scoring Change to 8th Grade ELA Exam.  When factoring in these changes, it appears that performance on this exam has remained steady or declined since 2001 despite the appearance of a small improvement.

The above chart shows the percentage of students scoring in each level in each of the 41 NY capital district public schools with 8th grades. The schools are arranged in order of the percentage of students passing the exam (scoring at Level 3 or 4) from most to least.  Scotia-Glenville is in 24th place and its score is outlined in red. 

The following table shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year rankings of capital district schools based on the percentage of students passing the 8th-grade ELA exam. Scotia-Glenville's performance has been consistently average, with the exception of 1999, as will be become clear in a later graphic.

Table of Various Rankings Based on ELA-8 Pass Rates

 
Rank Name Percent Passing 2005 Name Average Percent Passing 2003-2005 Name Average Percent Passing 2000-2005
1 Voorheesville 78.4 Maplewood 75.9 Menands 62.8
2 Maplewood 75 Voorheesville 74.9 Voorheesville 61.0
3 Menands 74.1 N. Colonie 72.6 N. Colonie 61.0
4 Schuylerville 73.6 Niskayuna 71.9 Niskayuna 60.0
5 Bethlehem 73.3 Menands 71.9 Bethlehem 59.7
6 N. Colonie 73.1 Bethlehem 71.1 Shenendehowa 56.5
7 Niskayuna 72.9 Schuylerville 68.4 Guilderland 54.7
8 Duanesburg 72 Shenendehowa 66.8 Burnt Hills 54.1
9 Shenendehowa 67.8 Schodack 66.4 Averill P. 54.0
10 Burnt Hills 66.5 Duanesburg 65.6 Schodack 53.9
11 Guilderland 66.2 Guilderland 65.1 Maplewood 51.2
12 Schodack 64.1 Averill P. 65.0 Saratoga 50.5
13 Mechanicville 63.7 Saratoga 63.6 Schuylerville 49.6
14 Averill P. 60 Burnt Hills 63.5 Wynantskill 48.0
15 Cornith 59.7 Mechanicville 60.1 Duanesburg 47.5
16 Saratoga 59.5 S. Glens Falls 58.2 Ballston Spa 47.0
17 Ballston Spa 59.2 Ballston Spa 58.0 S. Glens Falls 47.0
18 Waterford 59.1 S. Colonie 56.9 Mechanicville 46.8
19 Schalmont 59.1 Berne-Knox 54.9 Berne-Knox 46.2
20 Galway 59 Galway 54.7 S. Colonie 44.4
21 S. Glens Falls 58.4 Cornith 53.7 Brunswick 44.2
22 S. Colonie 57.4 Wynantskill 53.0 E. Greenbush 44.2
23 H. Falls 56.3 E. Greenbush 52.5 H. Valley 43.5
24 Scotia-Glenville 55.5 Stillwater 51.4 Scotia-Glenville 42.8
25 Stillwater 54.9 Scotia-Glenville 50.9 Cornith 42.8
26 Mohonasen 53.5 H. Valley 49.8 Galway 42.5
27 Berlin 52.9 Brunswick 49.6 Stillwater 41.5
28 Cohoes 50.6 Schalmont 48.7 Mohonasen 40.7
29 E. Greenbush 50.4 Mohonasen 48.0 Schalmont 40.5
30 Ravena 50 Ravena 46.7 Ravena 38.2
31 Berne-Knox 47.5 Cohoes 45.5 G. Island 37.5
32 Brunswick 46.5 Berlin 43.1 Cohoes 36.4
33 H. Valley 43.6 Waterford 42.7 Waterford 33.5
34 Lansingburgh 38.8 H. Falls 39.7 Berlin 33.1
35 Wynantskill 36.9 G. Island 39.2 H. Falls 32.8
36 G. Island 34.8 Lansingburgh 39.0 Lansingburgh 32.1
37 Rensselaer 34.6 Watervliet 34.9 Troy 27.7
38 Watervliet 32 Rensselaer 30.3 Rensselaer 27.0
39 Troy 31.3 Troy 30.3 Watervliet 25.8
40 Schenectady 24.8 Schenectady 26.0 Schenectady 21.5
41 Albany 19 Albany 23.3 Albany 18.4
AVERAGE 55.3   53.7   44.0

The following table shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year rankings of the schools based on the percentage of students performing in Level 4, the top level. S-G ranks 31st in the capital district, with the fewest students ever scoring in the top performance level of the ELA8 exam.  In 2005, S-G had a lower percentage of students scoring in Level 4 compared to its 3-year average, and both of these were lower than  its 6-year average. This indicates that over time fewer students are able to score in the top performance level. Schuylerville, on the other hand, shows an improving ability to move students into the top performance level. In 2005, it had 22.4% of its students performing at this level, compared to 18.1% for its 2003 to 2005 average and 13.5% for its 2000 to 2005 average.

Table of Various Rankings Based on ELA-8 Top Performance

 
Rank Name Top Performance 2005 Name Top Performance 2003-2005 Name Top Performance 2000-2005
1 Duanesburg 30.7 Menands 21.9 Menands 25.0
2 Schuylerville 22.4 Maplewood 21.8 Voorheesville 23.9
3 Niskayuna 21.4 Voorheesville 21.1 Niskayuna 23.9
4 N. Colonie 19.8 Niskayuna 21.1 Bethlehem 22.4
5 Bethlehem 18.3 N. Colonie 20.3 N. Colonie 22.0
6 Mechanicville 16.7 Mechanicville 18.6 Schodack 19.0
7 Shenendehowa 14.9 Schuylerville 18.1 Shenendehowa 18.1
8 Menands 14.8 Bethlehem 17.9 Averill P. 16.8
9 Voorheesville 14.7 Duanesburg 16.8 Burnt Hills 15.2
10 Schodack 14.6 Schodack 16.2 Guilderland 14.8
11 Ballston Spa 13.5 Shenendehowa 15.2 Mechanicville 14.6
12 Burnt Hills 13.1 Averill P. 14.2 Maplewood 14.2
13 Maplewood 12.5 Burnt Hills 13.7 Brunswick 14.0
14 Berne-Knox 11.9 Saratoga 13.7 Saratoga 13.8
15 Stillwater 10.8 Guilderland 12.4 Schuylerville 13.5
16 Guilderland 10.7 Ballston Spa 11.8 Berne-Knox 13.2
17 Brunswick 9.9 S. Glens Falls 11.7 Duanesburg 13.0
18 H. Falls 9.7 Berne-Knox 11.2 E. Greenbush 11.2
19 Waterford 9.7 S. Colonie 9.7 Cornith 10.8
20 S. Colonie 9.6 Brunswick 9.6 Ballston Spa 10.8
21 Cornith 9.2 Stillwater 9.1 Mohonasen 10.7
22 Galway 8.6 E. Greenbush 9.0 Schalmont 10.0
23 Saratoga 8.6 Cornith 8.6 S. Colonie 10.0
24 Ravena 8.2 Mohonasen 8.5 S. Glens Falls 10.0
25 Schalmont 7.7 Galway 7.9 Galway 9.9
26 Mohonasen 7.7 Schalmont 7.3 Stillwater 9.8
27 E. Greenbush 7.5 Ravena 7.2 Scotia-Glenville 9.0
28 Cohoes 6.3 Scotia-Glenville 6.7 Ravena 8.0
29 Averill P. 6.3 H. Falls 6.4 Cohoes 7.8
30 S. Glens Falls 5.9 Wynantskill 6.1 Wynantskill 7.6
31 Scotia-Glenville 5.3 Lansingburgh 5.9 H. Falls 7.5
32 Lansingburgh 4.8 Cohoes 5.7 H. Valley 6.9
33 H. Valley 4 H. Valley 5.5 Lansingburgh 5.8
34 Watervliet 3.9 Waterford 5.2 G. Island 5.5
35 Rensselaer 3.6 Watervliet 4.3 Waterford 5.5
36 Schenectady 2.5 Albany 3.5 Troy 4.8
37 Berlin 2.4 Schenectady 2.9 Rensselaer 3.8
38 Wynantskill 2.2 Rensselaer 2.8 Albany 3.5
39 Troy 2.2 Troy 2.7 Watervliet 3.2
40 Albany 1.5 G. Island 2.0 Schenectady 3.2
41 G. Island 0 Berlin 1.5 Berlin 3.1
AVERAGE 10.0   10.6   11.6

The next table answers the questions, "Which schools are making the most improvement and how much improvement are they making?"  On average, schools lost 1.1 points of the percentage of students passing the 8th grade ELA exam. Schools that had above average pass rates for 1999-2000 lost an average of 5.1 points of the percentage of students passing the exam. Schools with below average pass rates for 1999-2000 added an average of 2.7 points to their pass rates.  This seems to be mostly the result of lowering the cut-off scores for Level 1.

Once again, Scotia-Glenville ranks very low in "improvement"-- 34th.  In fact, the percentage of students passing the 8th-grade ELA has actually declined by 7 points, compared to the average 5.1 point average decline for schools with above average pass rates in 1999 and 2000.

Table of Improvement on the ELA-8 Exam

 

Rank Name Point Improvement to Pass Rate 2004 & 2005 Average Percentage Passing 1999 & 2000 Average Percentage Passing
1 Schuylerville 23.8 68.8 45.0
2 Mechanicville 18.7 69.2 50.5
3 S. Glens Falls 13.8 56.8 43.0
4 Ballston Spa 10.9 58.4 47.5
5 Cornith 9.8 56.3 46.5
6 Ravena 6.6 47.1 40.5
7 Wynantskill 6.6 49.6 43.0
8 Rensselaer 4.7 28.2 23.5
9 Watervliet 3.9 33.4 29.5
10 Cohoes 3.5 50.0 46.5
11 Saratoga 3.4 63.4 60.0
12 Lansingburgh 3.1 36.6 33.5
13 Waterford 2.1 50.6 48.5
14 Galway 2.1 58.6 56.5
15 Berlin 1.1 43.1 42.0
16 Menands -0.2 70.9 71.0
17 Duanesburg -0.5 65.0 65.5
18 H. Valley -0.5 49.5 50.0
19 Troy -1.1 32.0 33.0
20 Averill P. -1.4 62.6 64.0
21 Maplewood -1.6 75.0 76.5
22 Stillwater -2.4 50.6 53.0
23 S. Colonie -2.9 60.2 63.0
24 Shenendehowa -3.5 68.0 71.5
25 Niskayuna -3.8 72.8 76.5
26 Brunswick -4.8 48.3 53.0
27 Bethlehem -5.3 70.7 76.0
28 N. Colonie -5.8 71.7 77.5
29 E. Greenbush -6.0 50.5 56.5
30 Albany -6.4 21.7 28.0
31 Burnt Hills -6.6 64.4 71.0
32 Schenectady -6.7 25.4 32.0
33 Voorheesville -6.8 74.7 81.5
34 Scotia-Glenville -7.0 53.6 60.5
35 Guilderland -8.7 63.3 72.0
36 Berne-Knox -10.1 50.0 60.0
37 Mohonasen -10.6 48.4 59.0
38 H. Falls -12.7 41.8 54.5
39 Schodack -12.9 62.2 75.0
40 Schalmont -14.4 47.7 62.0
41 G. Island -17.9 32.1 50.0
AVERAGE -1.1 53.7 54.8
Average improvement in scores for schools above average in 1999/2000 -5.1    
Average improvement in scores for schools below average in 1999/2000 2.7    

The following graphic shows the grade point average for the capital district on the 8th-grade ELA exam, which is compared to the area low, the area high and Scotia-Glenville's GPA. The graph clearly shows that S-G has average results on the 8th-grade ELA exam.  Any idea that we simply can't be doing better ought to be flatly rejected.

4th-GRADE MATH RESULTS

In the above chart, I answer the question, "How has the number of students performing in each level changed over time, assuming the same number of students took the exam each year?"  The number of students performing in each of the levels are based on the average number of students taking the test from 1999 to 2005.  I calculate these numbers using the percentages provided by the state for each performance level.

Interpretation of Performance Levels:

Level 4 – exceeds the standards
Level 3 – meets all the standards
Level 2 – meets some of the standards or partially meets the standards
Level 1 – shows serious academic difficulties.

The above chart shows the percentage of students scoring in each level in each of the 42 NY capital district public schools with elementary schools.  The schools are arranged in order of the percentage of students passing the exam (scoring at Level 3 or 4) from most to least.  Scotia-Glenville is in 16th place with 93% passing--the best ever.  Its score is outlined in red.  Even though S-G's 4th grade math performance is improving, other districts are improving even faster.  Moreover, S-G doesn't place nearly as many students in the top level as better performing schools.  For example, Burnt-Hills has 54% scoring in the top level compared to S-G's 43%.

The following table shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year rankings of capital district schools based on the percentage of students passing the 4th-grade math exam.  Scotia-Glenville's performance relative to other area school districts in 2005 is essentially the same as its 6-year ranking.

Table of Various Rankings Based on MATH-4 Pass Rates
Rank Name Percent Passing 2005 Name Average Percent Passing 2003-2005 Name Average Percent Passing 2000-2005
1 Edinburg 100 Edinburg 100.0 Voorheesville 94.6
2 Maplewood 100 Schuylerville 98.8 Maplewood 93.6
3 Menands 100 Maplewood 96.8 Niskayuna 93.5
4 Schuylerville 98.6 Menands 96.3 Schuylerville 93.3
5 E. Greenbush 97.8 Niskayuna 96.0 Bethlehem 92.7
6 Niskayuna 97.5 E. Greenbush 95.5 Menands 92.1
7 Burnt Hills 96.8 Voorheesville 95.4 Schodack 92.0
8 N. Colonie 96.4 Burnt Hills 94.7 Burnt Hills 91.8
9 S. Glens Falls 96.1 S. Glens Falls 94.6 Averill P. 91.7
10 Averill P. 95.9 Bethlehem 94.4 S. Glens Falls 91.6
11 S. Colonie 95.7 N. Colonie 93.8 N. Colonie 91.2
12 Voorheesville 95 Averill P. 93.0 Edinburg 90.4
13 Saratoga 94.3 Schalmont 92.9 E. Greenbush 90.3
14 Duanesburg 93.7 G. Island 92.2 Guilderland 90.0
15 Bethlehem 93.1 Guilderland 92.2 S. Colonie 88.1
16 Guilderland 93.1 Schodack 91.8 Scotia-Glenville 87.9
17 Scotia-Glenville 93.1 S. Colonie 91.5 Stillwater 86.7
18 G. Island 92.9 Stillwater 90.8 Schalmont 86.1
19 Shenendehowa 92.8 Saratoga 90.2 Saratoga 86.1
20 Schodack 92.7 Scotia-Glenville 89.0 Wynantskill 85.8
21 Schalmont 91.3 Duanesburg 88.5 Mohonasen 85.5
22 Stillwater 90.9 Shenendehowa 88.0 Shenendehowa 84.9
23 Mohonasen 88.8 Mohonasen 87.5 Duanesburg 83.2
24 Berne-Knox 88 H. Valley 85.2 G. Island 81.6
25 Ballston Spa 87.4 Wynantskill 85.2 Berne-Knox 80.1
26 Cohoes 87.2 Brunswick 85.1 H. Falls 80.0
27 Lansingburgh 86.3 Berne-Knox 84.4 Brunswick 79.9
28 H. Valley 84.8 H. Falls 83.9 H. Valley 79.7
29 Berlin 83.5 Watervliet 82.0 Cohoes 78.1
30 H. Falls 83.5 Ballston Spa 81.8 Galway 78.1
31 Mechanicville 81.9 Cornith 80.8 Ballston Spa 77.9
32 Waterford 81.9 Cohoes 80.2 Watervliet 76.9
33 Galway 81.2 Waterford 79.4 Ravena 76.4
34 Brunswick 81 Ravena 79.4 Mechanicville 75.0
35 Wynantskill 80.8 Lansingburgh 79.0 Cornith 74.4
36 Cornith 80.2 Mechanicville 78.6 Waterford 73.8
37 Rensselaer 78 Berlin 77.1 Lansingburgh 72.4
38 Ravena 77.3 Galway 76.7 Troy 66.9
39 Troy 77.2 Rensselaer 74.8 Schenectady 65.6
40 Watervliet 76.9 Schenectady 71.4 Berlin 65.4
41 Schenectady 74.4 Troy 70.1 Rensselaer 63.7
42 Albany 72.4 Albany 68.9 Albany 61.7
AVERAGE 88.8   86.9   82.6

The following table shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year rankings of the schools based on the percentage of students performing in Level 4, the top level.  East Greenbush (with about 300 4th-graders) is a good example of a school district with better top performance than S-G that has made consistent improvement at a faster rate.

Table of Various Rankings Based on MATH-4 Top Performance

Rank Name Top Performance 2005 Name Top Performance 2003-2005 Name Top Performance 2000-2005
1 Edinburg 77.8 Niskayuna 57.6 Niskayuna 50.8
2 Maplewood 66.7 Menands 54.7 Menands 49.7
3 E. Greenbush 63.8 Guilderland 53.1 Bethlehem 49.1
4 Menands 61.9 E. Greenbush 52.6 Edinburg 47.4
5 Guilderland 60.5 Voorheesville 52.3 Voorheesville 46.9
6 Voorheesville 56.3 Edinburg 49.9 Schodack 44.8
7 Niskayuna 54.3 Bethlehem 49.1 Burnt Hills 44.5
8 Burnt Hills 54 Saratoga 46.4 E. Greenbush 43.2
9 S. Colonie 54 Burnt Hills 46.2 Guilderland 43.1
10 Saratoga 51.2 S. Glens Falls 45.8 N. Colonie 41.6
11 S. Glens Falls 51.2 N. Colonie 45.6 Stillwater 40.4
12 Bethlehem 50.9 S. Colonie 45.0 S. Colonie 39.2
13 Averill P. 49.6 Stillwater 42.9 S. Glens Falls 39.1
14 Schuylerville 48.3 Maplewood 39.8 Averill P. 38.5
15 Ballston Spa 48.1 Schalmont 39.2 Saratoga 38.4
16 N. Colonie 46.1 Averill P. 39.1 Maplewood 35.8
17 Stillwater 44.3 Schodack 39.0 Schuylerville 34.7
18 Scotia-Glenville 43.2 Schuylerville 37.4 Scotia-Glenville 33.2
19 Duanesburg 42.2 Scotia-Glenville 36.4 Mohonasen 32.2
20 Schalmont 41.3 Shenendehowa 35.1 Shenendehowa 31.7
21 Schodack 39.4 Ballston Spa 34.2 Schalmont 31.6
22 Mohonasen 37.6 Duanesburg 33.5 Wynantskill 29.5
23 Shenendehowa 34.9 Mohonasen 33.3 Duanesburg 29.4
24 Cohoes 32.3 G. Island 33.2 Ballston Spa 29.3
25 G. Island 32.1 H. Valley 30.8 G. Island 27.6
26 H. Falls 32 H. Falls 30.3 H. Valley 26.1
27 H. Valley 31.3 Ravena 28.4 Berne-Knox 25.2
28 Berne-Knox 30.7 Berne-Knox 27.6 H. Falls 24.6
29 Lansingburgh 30.3 Brunswick 26.7 Brunswick 23.6
30 Ravena 30.2 Cornith 25.9 Ravena 23.3
31 Cornith 26.4 Wynantskill 24.1 Cohoes 21.4
32 Galway 23.5 Cohoes 22.6 Galway 21.2
33 Brunswick 22.9 Lansingburgh 21.7 Cornith 20.6
34 Schenectady 22.7 Watervliet 21.4 Watervliet 19.2
35 Albany 21 Waterford 19.9 Lansingburgh 18.7
36 Rensselaer 20.9 Schenectady 19.7 Schenectady 16.9
37 Troy 20.4 Berlin 19.4 Berlin 16.7
38 Waterford 18.2 Galway 18.4 Waterford 15.9
39 Mechanicville 18.1 Albany 18.2 Albany 15.7
40 Wynantskill 17.3 Troy 16.0 Troy 15.2
41 Watervliet 16.5 Rensselaer 13.7 Mechanicville 14.5
42 Berlin 15.1 Mechanicville 12.3 Rensselaer 10.5
AVERAGE 39.0   34.2   31.0

The next table answers the questions, "Which schools are making the most improvement and how much improvement are they making?"  This chart uses all 7 years of math scores.  I average the percentage of students passing the exams in each school for 1999 and 2000 and compare this to the average of the percentage of students passing the exams in each school for 2004 and 2005.  This can be interpreted as an analysis of improvement over 3 years.

On average, schools have added 8.9 points to the percentage of students passing the 4th grade math exam.  Schools that had above average pass rates for 1999-2000 have added an average of 4.2 points to the percentage of students passing the exam.  Schools with below average pass rates for 1999-2000 have added an average of 14.7 points to their pass rates.  Factors that can cause improvements in scores (here) include:

bullet

Changes in state learning standards.

bullet

Changes in state achievement standards.  These define the levels of proficiency.

bullet

Changes in exam difficulty, content and/or format.

bullet

Changes in grading rubrics.

bullet

Changes in the degree of exam similarity from year to year.

bullet

Changes in grade-level retention rates.

bullet

Students moving into better performing school districts

bullet

Changes in scale score conversions or in cut-off scores

bullet

Improvements in gaming the test, including institutionalized cheating.

bullet

Changes in the level of information about what will be on the test (test-content intelligence).

bullet

Improved instruction/learning from increasing classroom time spent on math, using math across the curriculum, improved teaching techniques from professional development, after-school classes, better assessments of students' strengths and weaknesses and more individual help.

Scotia-Glenville ranks 32nd in "improvement."  Niskayuna's improvement is nearly twice as large as S-G's despite its higher average pass rate for 1999 and 2000.

Table of Improvement on the MATH-4 Exam

Rank Name Point Improvement to Pass Rate 2004 & 2005 Average Percentage Passing 1999 & 2000 Average Percentage Passing
1 Rensselaer 30.4 77.4 47.0
2 Edinburg 27.0 100.0 73.0
3 G. Island 20.0 90.5 70.5
4 H. Valley 18.3 86.3 68.0
5 Schalmont 18.0 92.5 74.5
6 Schuylerville 17.1 98.6 81.5
7 Albany 16.5 71.0 54.5