|
2005 4th & 8th Grade ELA &
Math Results (NY) |
Updated
19 Aug 2006
|
Prior
Years' Data:
1999 2000
2001 2002
2003 2004
Resources:
2005 -
NYSED English Language
Arts Test Press Release
2005
- NYSED ELA Database & PowerPoint Files
S-G's
Middling 2005 ELA Results
Commentary
on Area 2005 ELA Results
2005
- NYSED Math Test Press Release
S-G's
Ambiguous 2005 Math Results
Bonus:
2005 NAEP & NY Scores
Compared
Awards:
BEST K-8 English Language
Program: Niskayuna and Bethlehem
MOST IMPROVED K-8 English
Language Program: Schuylerville
and Cornith
BEST K-8 Math Program: Niskayuna
and Burnt-Hills
MOST IMPROVED K-8 Math Program: Schuylerville
and Mechanicville
Honorable Mention for Math &
English: Edinburg
(an elementary-only school)
TABLES AND CHARTS
Summary Data
Percentage
of NY Schools Having Higher Scores
Than S-G
S-G Math & English Scores
S-G Ranking Among 41 Capital District
Schools
ELA Results
Capital District Performance on the
4th-Grade ELA Exam
2005 4th-Grade ELA School District
Rankings
Table of Various ELA-4 Rankings Based on
Pass Rates
Table of Various ELA-4 Rankings Based on
Top Performance
Table of Improvement on the ELA-4 Exam
Area ELA-4 Grade Point Average with High, Low
& S-G
Capital District Performance on the
8th-Grade ELA Exam
2005 8th-Grade ELA School District
Rankings
Table of Various ELA-8 Rankings Based on
Pass Rates
Table of Various ELA-8 Rankings Based on
Top Performance
Table of Improvement on the ELA-8 Exam
Area ELA-8 Grade Point Average with High, Low
& S-G
Math Results
Capital District Performance on the
4th-Grade Math Exam
2005 4th-Grade Math School District
Rankings
Table of Various Math-4 Rankings Based on
Pass Rates
Table of Various Math-4 Rankings Based on
Top Performance
Table of Improvement on the Math-4 Exam
Area Math-4 Grade Point Average with High, Low
& S-G
Capital District Performance on the
8th-Grade Math Exam
2005 8th-Grade Math School District
Rankings
Table of Various Math-8 Rankings Based on
Pass Rates
Table of Various Math-8 Rankings Based on
Top Performance
Table of Improvement on the Math-8 Exam
Area Math-8 Grade Point Average with High, Low
& S-G
A Final Graphic
Area GPA for All 4 Exams with High,
Low & S-G
Percentage
of NY Schools Having Higher Scores
Than S-G
Still think S-G is the
Blue Ribbon National School of Excellence it was in the
early '90s? |
| Score |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
| 4th ELA Mean |
39% |
34% |
40% |
30% |
17%
(best ever) |
| 4th ELA Top Level |
34% |
38% |
38% |
29% |
13%
(best ever) |
| 4th Math Mean |
42%
(tied for worst) |
34%
(best ever) |
40% |
42% |
|
| 4th Math Top Level |
40% |
34%
(best ever) |
45% |
45% |
|
| 8th ELA Mean |
40% |
40% |
45% |
30%
(best ever) |
33% |
| 8th
ELA Top Level |
60%
(worst ever) |
42% |
58% |
53% |
33%
(best ever) |
| 8th Math Mean |
24%
(best ever) |
31% |
32% |
35% |
|
| 8th Math Top Level* |
37%
(worst ever) |
25% |
28% |
24%
(best ever) |
|
* Note: S-G eighth graders who take 8th grade math in 7th
grade--about 10% of the class-- do not take the 8th grade math
exam until the 8th grade.
|
S-G Math & English Scores
Grades 8 and 4
1999-2005
RED: Fails to meet standards
Shaded areas are the same graduating class.
|
| Level |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
Math8
1
|
11 |
12 |
12 |
10 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
| 2 |
32 |
24 |
27 |
29 |
29 |
26 |
20 |
| 3 |
44 |
48 |
48 |
45 |
53 |
52 |
68 |
| 4 |
12 |
16 |
13 |
16 |
12 |
17 |
9 |
| English8
1 |
2 |
7 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
| 2 |
30 |
40 |
38 |
49 |
50 |
45 |
43 |
| 3 |
51 |
41 |
44 |
39 |
41 |
41 |
50 |
| 4 |
16 |
12 |
12 |
9 |
4 |
11 |
5 |
| Math4 1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
| 2 |
13 |
10 |
11 |
18 |
15 |
8 |
5 |
| 3 |
50 |
62 |
53 |
54 |
52 |
56 |
50 |
| 4 |
36 |
27 |
36 |
27 |
31 |
35 |
43 |
| English4 1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
| 2 |
30 |
14 |
17 |
19 |
21 |
24 |
19 |
| 3 |
59 |
50 |
49 |
51 |
50 |
58 |
53 |
| 4 |
11 |
35 |
30 |
28 |
25 |
16 |
24 |
In addition to showing S-G's performance on state
exams, the table above permits a comparison of the performance of
8th graders in 2003-2005 with their 1999-2001 4th grade
performance. Based on 2003 scores, by 8th grade
three-quarters of our best English students and two-thirds of our
best math students had been normalized. Based on 2004
scores, by 8th grade we lost 70% of our top performing English
students and 37% of our top performing math students.
Score attrition between 4th and 8th grade became worse in
2005. 30% of
our 4th graders scored in the top level on the 2001 ELA exam, but
by 2005 only 5% did. 36% of 4th graders earned the top score
in 2001, but on the 2005 8th-grade math exam only 9% earned the
top score. This trend is a direct result of the
district's practice of teaching to the middle with an emphasis on the Level 1's and 2's.
Our best performing students are being under-challenged and
basically ignored because of an entrenched ideology to equalize
students rather than provide every student with the opportunities
needed for her/his greatest success.
|
S-G Ranking Among 41 Capital District
Schools
|
|
Score/ Year
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
1999
|
|
4th Grade Mean
|
20 |
17
|
22
|
18
|
12
|
8
|
11
|
|
4th Grade Top Level
|
19 |
15
|
22
|
16
|
11
|
10
|
13
|
|
8th Grade Mean
|
18
|
22
|
26
|
21
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
8th Grade Top Level
|
25
|
20
|
27
|
15
|
16
|
10
|
11
|
4th-GRADE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
ARTS RESULTS
In the above chart, I answer the question,
"How has the number of students performing in each level
changed over time, assuming the same number of students took the
exam each year?" The number of students performing in
each of the levels for 2005 are the actual numbers. For
prior years, the number of students performing in each level
reflects the number of students who would have been placed in
each level had the same number of students taken the test as in
2005. I calculate these numbers using the percentages
provided by the state for each performance level.
Interpretation of Performance
Levels:
Level 4 – exceeds the standards
Level 3 – meets all the standards
Level 2 – meets some of the standards or partially meets the
standards
Level 1 – shows serious academic difficulties.

The
above chart shows the percentage of students scoring in each level
in each of the 42 NY capital district public schools with
elementary schools. The schools are arranged in order of the
percentage of students passing the exam (scoring at Level 3 or 4)
from most to least. Scotia-Glenville is in 21st place and
its score is outlined in red. The following table
shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year rankings of capital district schools
based on the percentage of students passing the 4th-grade ELA
exam. The more years averaged into the ranking, the better
Scotia-Glenville does. That's because relative to other
schools, its performance has been declining over time. This
will become more apparent in a later graphic. Table
of Various Rankings Based on ELA-4 Pass Rates
| Rank |
Name |
Percent
Passing 2005 |
Name |
Average
Percent Passing 2003-2005 |
Name |
Average
Percent Passing 2000-2005 |
| 1 |
Edinburg |
100 |
Niskayuna |
87.5 |
Maplewood |
87.4 |
| 2 |
Menands |
95 |
Bethlehem |
85.3 |
Bethlehem |
86.7 |
| 3 |
Schuylerville |
89.6 |
Voorheesville |
84.3 |
Niskayuna |
86.7 |
| 4 |
Niskayuna |
88.5 |
Maplewood |
83.3 |
Voorheesville |
85.2 |
| 5 |
Burnt Hills |
87.5 |
Schuylerville |
83.3 |
Edinburg |
84.6 |
| 6 |
Duanesburg |
87.5 |
Burnt Hills |
82.9 |
Burnt Hills |
83.0 |
| 7 |
Bethlehem |
87.4 |
G. Island |
82.8 |
N. Colonie |
81.7 |
| 8 |
Maplewood |
86.7 |
E. Greenbush |
81.9 |
Menands |
80.8 |
| 9 |
Voorheesville |
86.4 |
Edinburg |
80.6 |
S. Glens Falls |
80.1 |
| 10 |
E. Greenbush |
85.5 |
Averill P. |
79.9 |
Averill P. |
79.9 |
| 11 |
S. Glens Falls |
85.3 |
Saratoga |
79.7 |
Schuylerville |
79.7 |
| 12 |
Saratoga |
84.4 |
N. Colonie |
79.2 |
E. Greenbush |
78.9 |
| 13 |
Averill P. |
83.8 |
S. Glens Falls |
79.0 |
Saratoga |
78.8 |
| 14 |
Guilderland |
82.4 |
Menands |
78.7 |
Scotia-Glenville |
78.2 |
| 15 |
G. Island |
82.1 |
Guilderland |
76.8 |
Guilderland |
77.8 |
| 16 |
S. Colonie |
81 |
S. Colonie |
76.7 |
Shenendehowa |
76.9 |
| 17 |
Shenendehowa |
80.7 |
Shenendehowa |
75.5 |
Schodack |
76.8 |
| 18 |
Stillwater |
80.5 |
Cornith |
75.4 |
S. Colonie |
75.4 |
| 19 |
N. Colonie |
79 |
Scotia-Glenville |
75.1 |
Stillwater |
74.7 |
| 20 |
Ballston Spa |
78.2 |
Waterford |
74.9 |
Brunswick |
72.9 |
| 21 |
Scotia-Glenville |
77.3 |
Stillwater |
74.5 |
Duanesburg |
72.4 |
| 22 |
Galway |
75.9 |
Schodack |
73.9 |
Waterford |
71.3 |
| 23 |
Schodack |
75.7 |
Duanesburg |
73.4 |
Galway |
70.8 |
| 24 |
Cornith |
74.3 |
Galway |
72.7 |
Wynantskill |
70.5 |
| 25 |
Cohoes |
74.1 |
Schalmont |
71.3 |
G. Island |
69.9 |
| 26 |
Schalmont |
73.1 |
Brunswick |
70.6 |
Ballston Spa |
68.1 |
| 27 |
H. Valley |
72 |
Ballston Spa |
70.0 |
Cornith |
68.0 |
| 28 |
Mechanicville |
71.2 |
H. Valley |
69.0 |
Schalmont |
67.8 |
| 29 |
Mohonasen |
68.5 |
Berne-Knox |
67.2 |
H. Valley |
67.3 |
| 30 |
Lansingburgh |
66.8 |
Wynantskill |
64.8 |
Mohonasen |
66.0 |
| 31 |
Berne-Knox |
66.2 |
Mohonasen |
62.9 |
Mechanicville |
65.2 |
| 32 |
Brunswick |
65.7 |
Cohoes |
62.6 |
Berne-Knox |
64.2 |
| 33 |
Ravena |
64.4 |
Mechanicville |
61.9 |
Cohoes |
61.7 |
| 34 |
Waterford |
64.2 |
H. Falls |
61.3 |
Ravena |
60.9 |
| 35 |
H. Falls |
62.4 |
Watervliet |
58.4 |
H. Falls |
60.6 |
| 36 |
Berlin |
62.2 |
Ravena |
58.0 |
Berlin |
57.4 |
| 37 |
Rensselaer |
61.2 |
Berlin |
57.2 |
Watervliet |
56.2 |
| 38 |
Troy |
53.9 |
Lansingburgh |
57.2 |
Lansingburgh |
56.1 |
| 39 |
Schenectady |
53.7 |
Troy |
50.8 |
Troy |
54.4 |
| 40 |
Albany |
53 |
Schenectady |
48.7 |
Rensselaer |
48.3 |
| 41 |
Wynantskill |
52 |
Albany |
48.0 |
Schenectady |
47.3 |
| 42 |
Watervliet |
50 |
Rensselaer |
48.0 |
Albany |
46.0 |
|
AVERAGE |
75.0 |
|
71.1 |
|
70.9 |
The following table shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year
rankings of the schools based on the percentage of students
performing in Level 4, the top level. In 2005, S-G had a
higher percentage of students scoring in Level 4 compared to its
3-year average but a lower percentage compared to its 6-year
average. This indicates an inconsistent ability to move
students into the top performance level. Schuylerville, on
the other hand, shows an improving ability to move students into
the top performance level. In 2005, it had 36.8% of its
students performing at this level, compared to 26.6% for its 2003
to 2005 average and 22.2% for its 2000 to 2005 average.
Table of Various
Rankings Based on ELA-4 Top Performance
| Rank |
Name |
Top
Performance 2005 |
Name |
Top
Performance 2003-2005 |
Name |
Top
Performance 2000-2005 |
| 1 |
Edinburg |
77.8 |
G. Island |
41.9 |
Bethlehem |
33.9 |
| 2 |
G. Island |
50 |
Edinburg |
37.0 |
Niskayuna |
33.6 |
| 3 |
Schuylerville |
36.8 |
Menands |
32.1 |
Voorheesville |
31.0 |
| 4 |
E. Greenbush |
34.6 |
Niskayuna |
31.8 |
Menands |
30.7 |
| 5 |
Ballston Spa |
34.1 |
Saratoga |
30.9 |
G. Island |
30.4 |
| 6 |
Bethlehem |
34 |
Voorheesville |
30.2 |
Burnt Hills |
29.6 |
| 7 |
Niskayuna |
32.5 |
Bethlehem |
29.9 |
N. Colonie |
29.4 |
| 8 |
Saratoga |
31.7 |
Maplewood |
28.2 |
Edinburg |
29.1 |
| 9 |
Menands |
30 |
E. Greenbush |
28.0 |
Saratoga |
28.7 |
| 10 |
Voorheesville |
29.6 |
Cornith |
26.9 |
Maplewood |
28.2 |
| 11 |
Burnt Hills |
29.4 |
Averill P. |
26.6 |
E. Greenbush |
27.9 |
| 12 |
N. Colonie |
28.5 |
Schuylerville |
26.6 |
Scotia-Glenville |
26.5 |
| 13 |
Cohoes |
25.9 |
Burnt Hills |
25.7 |
Averill P. |
26.2 |
| 14 |
Stillwater |
25.3 |
N. Colonie |
25.7 |
Stillwater |
25.5 |
| 15 |
Guilderland |
24.8 |
Ballston Spa |
25.7 |
Guilderland |
25.1 |
| 16 |
Shenendehowa |
24.7 |
Stillwater |
23.9 |
Ballston Spa |
24.3 |
| 17 |
Averill P. |
24.5 |
S. Colonie |
22.7 |
Schodack |
24.0 |
| 18 |
Scotia-Glenville |
24.5 |
Guilderland |
22.5 |
Shenendehowa |
23.7 |
| 19 |
S. Glens Falls |
22.5 |
S. Glens Falls |
22.4 |
S. Colonie |
23.4 |
| 20 |
Cornith |
21.9 |
Waterford |
22.2 |
S. Glens Falls |
22.6 |
| 21 |
Duanesburg |
21.9 |
Shenendehowa |
21.8 |
Schuylerville |
22.2 |
| 22 |
Schalmont |
21.9 |
Scotia-Glenville |
21.8 |
Brunswick |
20.9 |
| 23 |
Maplewood |
20 |
Schodack |
21.0 |
Galway |
20.7 |
| 24 |
H. Valley |
20 |
Schalmont |
20.0 |
Wynantskill |
19.5 |
| 25 |
Schodack |
19.6 |
Galway |
19.2 |
Waterford |
18.9 |
| 26 |
Galway |
19.5 |
Cohoes |
18.5 |
H. Valley |
18.1 |
| 27 |
S. Colonie |
19 |
Duanesburg |
17.5 |
Cornith |
18.0 |
| 28 |
Berlin |
16.2 |
H. Valley |
17.0 |
Schalmont |
17.7 |
| 29 |
Mechanicville |
14.9 |
Brunswick |
16.8 |
Duanesburg |
17.6 |
| 30 |
Ravena |
13.6 |
Berne-Knox |
13.9 |
Mechanicville |
17.2 |
| 31 |
Berne-Knox |
12.2 |
Berlin |
13.9 |
Cohoes |
16.5 |
| 32 |
Waterford |
11.9 |
Ravena |
13.2 |
Berne-Knox |
15.9 |
| 33 |
Mohonasen |
11.6 |
Wynantskill |
13.1 |
Ravena |
15.8 |
| 34 |
Brunswick |
11.4 |
Watervliet |
12.7 |
Mohonasen |
15.3 |
| 35 |
Albany |
10.7 |
Mechanicville |
12.7 |
Berlin |
12.4 |
| 36 |
H. Falls |
10.4 |
Mohonasen |
12.6 |
Watervliet |
11.5 |
| 37 |
Watervliet |
10 |
H. Falls |
12.3 |
H. Falls |
10.9 |
| 38 |
Troy |
9.6 |
Lansingburgh |
11.0 |
Troy |
10.6 |
| 39 |
Rensselaer |
8.9 |
Albany |
10.0 |
Lansingburgh |
10.3 |
| 40 |
Schenectady |
8.3 |
Troy |
9.7 |
Albany |
10.0 |
| 41 |
Wynantskill |
5.8 |
Schenectady |
7.2 |
Schenectady |
8.3 |
| 42 |
Lansingburgh |
5.6 |
Rensselaer |
5.8 |
Rensselaer |
6.0 |
|
|
22.5 |
|
21.0 |
|
21.1 |
The next table answers the questions, "Which
schools are making the most improvement and how much improvement
are they making?" This chart uses all 7 years of ELA
scores. I average the percentage of students passing the
exams in each school for 1999 and 2000 and compare them to the
average of the percentage of students passing the exams in each
school for 2004 and 2005. This can be interpreted as an
analysis of improvement over 3 years.
On average, schools have added 6.1 points to the
percentage of students passing the 4th grade ELA exam.
Schools that had above average pass rates for 1999-2000 have added
an average of 1.6 points to the percentage of students passing the
exam. Schools with below average pass rates for 1999-2000
have added an average of 10.4 points to their pass rates.
Factors that can cause improvements in scores (here)
include:
Scotia-Glenville ranks 36th in
"improvement." In fact, the percentage of students
passing the 4th-grade ELA has actually declined by 2 points,
compared to a 1.6 point average increase for schools with above
average pass rates in 1999 and 2000.
Table of Improvement on
the ELA-4 Exam
| Rank |
Name |
Point
Improvement to Pass Rate |
2004
& 2005 Average Percentage Passing |
1999
& 2000 Average Percentage Passing |
| 1 |
G. Island |
41.6 |
81.1 |
39.5 |
| 2 |
Schuylerville |
22.7 |
87.2 |
64.5 |
| 3 |
Stillwater |
18.0 |
79.0 |
61.0 |
| 4 |
E. Greenbush |
17.4 |
84.9 |
67.5 |
| 5 |
Cornith |
16.8 |
73.8 |
57.0 |
| 6 |
Cohoes |
16.1 |
63.6 |
47.5 |
| 7 |
Schalmont |
13.3 |
71.8 |
58.5 |
| 8 |
S. Colonie |
12.2 |
77.2 |
65.0 |
| 9 |
Edinburg |
12.0 |
87.5 |
75.5 |
| 10 |
Rensselaer |
12.0 |
52.0 |
40.0 |
| 11 |
Ballston Spa |
10.7 |
71.7 |
61.0 |
| 12 |
H. Valley |
10.6 |
70.6 |
60.0 |
| 13 |
Albany |
10.2 |
48.7 |
38.5 |
| 14 |
Berne-Knox |
8.7 |
66.2 |
57.5 |
| 15 |
Schenectady |
8.3 |
49.3 |
41.0 |
| 16 |
Averill P. |
7.8 |
78.4 |
70.5 |
| 17 |
S. Glens Falls |
7.4 |
84.4 |
77.0 |
| 18 |
Saratoga |
7.3 |
81.4 |
74.0 |
| 19 |
Watervliet |
7.1 |
52.6 |
45.5 |
| 20 |
Niskayuna |
6.9 |
89.4 |
82.5 |
| 21 |
Burnt Hills |
6.0 |
84.0 |
78.0 |
| 22 |
Mechanicville |
5.0 |
64.0 |
59.0 |
| 23 |
Maplewood |
4.8 |
86.9 |
82.0 |
| 24 |
Troy |
4.7 |
49.7 |
45.0 |
| 25 |
Bethlehem |
3.8 |
87.3 |
83.5 |
| 26 |
Galway |
3.4 |
70.9 |
67.5 |
| 27 |
Waterford |
3.3 |
68.3 |
65.0 |
| 28 |
H. Falls |
2.8 |
59.9 |
57.0 |
| 29 |
Shenendehowa |
2.3 |
76.3 |
74.0 |
| 30 |
N. Colonie |
2.1 |
79.1 |
77.0 |
| 31 |
Lansingburgh |
2.1 |
56.1 |
54.0 |
| 32 |
Guilderland |
1.5 |
78.0 |
76.5 |
| 33 |
Mohonasen |
-0.3 |
63.7 |
64.0 |
| 34 |
Ravena |
-1.0 |
59.1 |
60.0 |
| 35 |
Voorheesville |
-1.4 |
84.1 |
85.5 |
| 36 |
Scotia-Glenville |
-2.0 |
75.5 |
77.5 |
| 37 |
Berlin |
-2.3 |
56.8 |
59.0 |
| 38 |
Duanesburg |
-4.3 |
75.2 |
79.5 |
| 39 |
Schodack |
-7.0 |
72.5 |
79.5 |
| 40 |
Brunswick |
-10.0 |
66.5 |
76.5 |
| 41 |
Wynantskill |
-11.6 |
56.5 |
68.0 |
| 42 |
Menands |
-14.5 |
78.1 |
92.5 |
|
AVERAGE |
6.1 |
71.4 |
65.3 |
|
Average improvement in scores
for schools above average in 1999/2000 |
1.6 |
|
|
|
Average improvement in scores
for schools below average in 1999/2000 |
10.4 |
|
|
The following graphic shows the grade point
average for the capital district, which has been calculated by
summing the scores for all pupils and finding the average by
awarding 0.55 for Level 1, 1.7 for Level 2, 2.85 for Level 3 and
4.0 for Level 4. The area GPA is then compared to the area
low, the area high and Scotia-Glenville's GPA. The graph
clearly shows that S-G has moved away from the best performing
schools with scores nearly equaling the average for our area.

8th-GRADE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
ARTS RESULTS
The above graphic shows that performance on the
8th-grade ELA exam has declined since 1999, with 4,213 students
not meeting state standards in 1999 compared to 4,629 in
2005. Whenever the Commissioner talks about 8th-grade ELA
results, he generally makes his comparisons to 2001, the year of
worst performance. What the Commissioner never talks about
is how the cut-off and scale scores on this exam have been
changed since that time to make the exam easier to pass.
See, e.g., NY
Makes Huge Scoring Change to 8th Grade ELA Exam. When
factoring in these changes, it appears that performance on this
exam has remained steady or declined since 2001 despite the
appearance of a small improvement.
The above chart shows the percentage of students
scoring in each level in each of the 41 NY capital district
public schools with 8th grades. The schools are arranged in
order of the percentage of students passing the exam (scoring at
Level 3 or 4) from most to least. Scotia-Glenville is in
24th place and its score is outlined in red.
The following table shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year
rankings of capital district schools based on the percentage of
students passing the 8th-grade ELA exam. Scotia-Glenville's
performance has been consistently average, with the exception of
1999, as will be become clear in a later graphic.
Table of Various
Rankings Based on ELA-8 Pass Rates
| Rank |
Name |
Percent
Passing 2005 |
Name |
Average
Percent Passing 2003-2005 |
Name |
Average
Percent Passing 2000-2005 |
| 1 |
Voorheesville |
78.4 |
Maplewood |
75.9 |
Menands |
62.8 |
| 2 |
Maplewood |
75 |
Voorheesville |
74.9 |
Voorheesville |
61.0 |
| 3 |
Menands |
74.1 |
N. Colonie |
72.6 |
N. Colonie |
61.0 |
| 4 |
Schuylerville |
73.6 |
Niskayuna |
71.9 |
Niskayuna |
60.0 |
| 5 |
Bethlehem |
73.3 |
Menands |
71.9 |
Bethlehem |
59.7 |
| 6 |
N. Colonie |
73.1 |
Bethlehem |
71.1 |
Shenendehowa |
56.5 |
| 7 |
Niskayuna |
72.9 |
Schuylerville |
68.4 |
Guilderland |
54.7 |
| 8 |
Duanesburg |
72 |
Shenendehowa |
66.8 |
Burnt Hills |
54.1 |
| 9 |
Shenendehowa |
67.8 |
Schodack |
66.4 |
Averill P. |
54.0 |
| 10 |
Burnt Hills |
66.5 |
Duanesburg |
65.6 |
Schodack |
53.9 |
| 11 |
Guilderland |
66.2 |
Guilderland |
65.1 |
Maplewood |
51.2 |
| 12 |
Schodack |
64.1 |
Averill P. |
65.0 |
Saratoga |
50.5 |
| 13 |
Mechanicville |
63.7 |
Saratoga |
63.6 |
Schuylerville |
49.6 |
| 14 |
Averill P. |
60 |
Burnt Hills |
63.5 |
Wynantskill |
48.0 |
| 15 |
Cornith |
59.7 |
Mechanicville |
60.1 |
Duanesburg |
47.5 |
| 16 |
Saratoga |
59.5 |
S. Glens Falls |
58.2 |
Ballston Spa |
47.0 |
| 17 |
Ballston Spa |
59.2 |
Ballston Spa |
58.0 |
S. Glens Falls |
47.0 |
| 18 |
Waterford |
59.1 |
S. Colonie |
56.9 |
Mechanicville |
46.8 |
| 19 |
Schalmont |
59.1 |
Berne-Knox |
54.9 |
Berne-Knox |
46.2 |
| 20 |
Galway |
59 |
Galway |
54.7 |
S. Colonie |
44.4 |
| 21 |
S. Glens Falls |
58.4 |
Cornith |
53.7 |
Brunswick |
44.2 |
| 22 |
S. Colonie |
57.4 |
Wynantskill |
53.0 |
E. Greenbush |
44.2 |
| 23 |
H. Falls |
56.3 |
E. Greenbush |
52.5 |
H. Valley |
43.5 |
| 24 |
Scotia-Glenville |
55.5 |
Stillwater |
51.4 |
Scotia-Glenville |
42.8 |
| 25 |
Stillwater |
54.9 |
Scotia-Glenville |
50.9 |
Cornith |
42.8 |
| 26 |
Mohonasen |
53.5 |
H. Valley |
49.8 |
Galway |
42.5 |
| 27 |
Berlin |
52.9 |
Brunswick |
49.6 |
Stillwater |
41.5 |
| 28 |
Cohoes |
50.6 |
Schalmont |
48.7 |
Mohonasen |
40.7 |
| 29 |
E. Greenbush |
50.4 |
Mohonasen |
48.0 |
Schalmont |
40.5 |
| 30 |
Ravena |
50 |
Ravena |
46.7 |
Ravena |
38.2 |
| 31 |
Berne-Knox |
47.5 |
Cohoes |
45.5 |
G. Island |
37.5 |
| 32 |
Brunswick |
46.5 |
Berlin |
43.1 |
Cohoes |
36.4 |
| 33 |
H. Valley |
43.6 |
Waterford |
42.7 |
Waterford |
33.5 |
| 34 |
Lansingburgh |
38.8 |
H. Falls |
39.7 |
Berlin |
33.1 |
| 35 |
Wynantskill |
36.9 |
G. Island |
39.2 |
H. Falls |
32.8 |
| 36 |
G. Island |
34.8 |
Lansingburgh |
39.0 |
Lansingburgh |
32.1 |
| 37 |
Rensselaer |
34.6 |
Watervliet |
34.9 |
Troy |
27.7 |
| 38 |
Watervliet |
32 |
Rensselaer |
30.3 |
Rensselaer |
27.0 |
| 39 |
Troy |
31.3 |
Troy |
30.3 |
Watervliet |
25.8 |
| 40 |
Schenectady |
24.8 |
Schenectady |
26.0 |
Schenectady |
21.5 |
| 41 |
Albany |
19 |
Albany |
23.3 |
Albany |
18.4 |
|
AVERAGE |
55.3 |
|
53.7 |
|
44.0 |
The following table shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year
rankings of the schools based on the percentage of students
performing in Level 4, the top level. S-G ranks 31st in the
capital district, with the fewest students ever scoring in the
top performance level of the ELA8 exam. In 2005, S-G had a
lower percentage of students scoring in Level 4 compared to its
3-year average, and both of these were lower than its
6-year average. This indicates that over time fewer students are
able to score in the top performance level. Schuylerville, on
the other hand, shows an improving ability to move students into
the top performance level. In 2005, it had 22.4% of its students
performing at this level, compared to 18.1% for its 2003 to 2005
average and 13.5% for its 2000 to 2005 average.
Table of Various
Rankings Based on ELA-8 Top Performance
| Rank |
Name |
Top
Performance 2005 |
Name |
Top
Performance 2003-2005 |
Name |
Top
Performance 2000-2005 |
| 1 |
Duanesburg |
30.7 |
Menands |
21.9 |
Menands |
25.0 |
| 2 |
Schuylerville |
22.4 |
Maplewood |
21.8 |
Voorheesville |
23.9 |
| 3 |
Niskayuna |
21.4 |
Voorheesville |
21.1 |
Niskayuna |
23.9 |
| 4 |
N. Colonie |
19.8 |
Niskayuna |
21.1 |
Bethlehem |
22.4 |
| 5 |
Bethlehem |
18.3 |
N. Colonie |
20.3 |
N. Colonie |
22.0 |
| 6 |
Mechanicville |
16.7 |
Mechanicville |
18.6 |
Schodack |
19.0 |
| 7 |
Shenendehowa |
14.9 |
Schuylerville |
18.1 |
Shenendehowa |
18.1 |
| 8 |
Menands |
14.8 |
Bethlehem |
17.9 |
Averill P. |
16.8 |
| 9 |
Voorheesville |
14.7 |
Duanesburg |
16.8 |
Burnt Hills |
15.2 |
| 10 |
Schodack |
14.6 |
Schodack |
16.2 |
Guilderland |
14.8 |
| 11 |
Ballston Spa |
13.5 |
Shenendehowa |
15.2 |
Mechanicville |
14.6 |
| 12 |
Burnt Hills |
13.1 |
Averill P. |
14.2 |
Maplewood |
14.2 |
| 13 |
Maplewood |
12.5 |
Burnt Hills |
13.7 |
Brunswick |
14.0 |
| 14 |
Berne-Knox |
11.9 |
Saratoga |
13.7 |
Saratoga |
13.8 |
| 15 |
Stillwater |
10.8 |
Guilderland |
12.4 |
Schuylerville |
13.5 |
| 16 |
Guilderland |
10.7 |
Ballston Spa |
11.8 |
Berne-Knox |
13.2 |
| 17 |
Brunswick |
9.9 |
S. Glens Falls |
11.7 |
Duanesburg |
13.0 |
| 18 |
H. Falls |
9.7 |
Berne-Knox |
11.2 |
E. Greenbush |
11.2 |
| 19 |
Waterford |
9.7 |
S. Colonie |
9.7 |
Cornith |
10.8 |
| 20 |
S. Colonie |
9.6 |
Brunswick |
9.6 |
Ballston Spa |
10.8 |
| 21 |
Cornith |
9.2 |
Stillwater |
9.1 |
Mohonasen |
10.7 |
| 22 |
Galway |
8.6 |
E. Greenbush |
9.0 |
Schalmont |
10.0 |
| 23 |
Saratoga |
8.6 |
Cornith |
8.6 |
S. Colonie |
10.0 |
| 24 |
Ravena |
8.2 |
Mohonasen |
8.5 |
S. Glens Falls |
10.0 |
| 25 |
Schalmont |
7.7 |
Galway |
7.9 |
Galway |
9.9 |
| 26 |
Mohonasen |
7.7 |
Schalmont |
7.3 |
Stillwater |
9.8 |
| 27 |
E. Greenbush |
7.5 |
Ravena |
7.2 |
Scotia-Glenville |
9.0 |
| 28 |
Cohoes |
6.3 |
Scotia-Glenville |
6.7 |
Ravena |
8.0 |
| 29 |
Averill P. |
6.3 |
H. Falls |
6.4 |
Cohoes |
7.8 |
| 30 |
S. Glens Falls |
5.9 |
Wynantskill |
6.1 |
Wynantskill |
7.6 |
| 31 |
Scotia-Glenville |
5.3 |
Lansingburgh |
5.9 |
H. Falls |
7.5 |
| 32 |
Lansingburgh |
4.8 |
Cohoes |
5.7 |
H. Valley |
6.9 |
| 33 |
H. Valley |
4 |
H. Valley |
5.5 |
Lansingburgh |
5.8 |
| 34 |
Watervliet |
3.9 |
Waterford |
5.2 |
G. Island |
5.5 |
| 35 |
Rensselaer |
3.6 |
Watervliet |
4.3 |
Waterford |
5.5 |
| 36 |
Schenectady |
2.5 |
Albany |
3.5 |
Troy |
4.8 |
| 37 |
Berlin |
2.4 |
Schenectady |
2.9 |
Rensselaer |
3.8 |
| 38 |
Wynantskill |
2.2 |
Rensselaer |
2.8 |
Albany |
3.5 |
| 39 |
Troy |
2.2 |
Troy |
2.7 |
Watervliet |
3.2 |
| 40 |
Albany |
1.5 |
G. Island |
2.0 |
Schenectady |
3.2 |
| 41 |
G. Island |
0 |
Berlin |
1.5 |
Berlin |
3.1 |
|
AVERAGE |
10.0 |
|
10.6 |
|
11.6 |
The next table answers the questions, "Which
schools are making the most improvement and how much improvement
are they making?" On average, schools
lost 1.1 points of the percentage of students passing the
8th grade ELA exam. Schools that had above average pass rates for
1999-2000 lost an average of 5.1 points of the percentage of
students passing the exam. Schools with below average pass rates
for 1999-2000 added an average of 2.7 points to their pass
rates. This seems to be mostly the result of lowering the
cut-off scores for Level 1. Once again,
Scotia-Glenville ranks very low in "improvement"--
34th. In fact, the percentage of students passing the
8th-grade ELA has actually declined by 7 points, compared to the
average 5.1 point average decline for schools with above average
pass rates in 1999 and 2000. Table
of Improvement on the ELA-8 Exam
| Rank |
Name |
Point
Improvement to Pass Rate |
2004
& 2005 Average Percentage Passing |
1999
& 2000 Average Percentage Passing |
| 1 |
Schuylerville |
23.8 |
68.8 |
45.0 |
| 2 |
Mechanicville |
18.7 |
69.2 |
50.5 |
| 3 |
S. Glens Falls |
13.8 |
56.8 |
43.0 |
| 4 |
Ballston Spa |
10.9 |
58.4 |
47.5 |
| 5 |
Cornith |
9.8 |
56.3 |
46.5 |
| 6 |
Ravena |
6.6 |
47.1 |
40.5 |
| 7 |
Wynantskill |
6.6 |
49.6 |
43.0 |
| 8 |
Rensselaer |
4.7 |
28.2 |
23.5 |
| 9 |
Watervliet |
3.9 |
33.4 |
29.5 |
| 10 |
Cohoes |
3.5 |
50.0 |
46.5 |
| 11 |
Saratoga |
3.4 |
63.4 |
60.0 |
| 12 |
Lansingburgh |
3.1 |
36.6 |
33.5 |
| 13 |
Waterford |
2.1 |
50.6 |
48.5 |
| 14 |
Galway |
2.1 |
58.6 |
56.5 |
| 15 |
Berlin |
1.1 |
43.1 |
42.0 |
| 16 |
Menands |
-0.2 |
70.9 |
71.0 |
| 17 |
Duanesburg |
-0.5 |
65.0 |
65.5 |
| 18 |
H. Valley |
-0.5 |
49.5 |
50.0 |
| 19 |
Troy |
-1.1 |
32.0 |
33.0 |
| 20 |
Averill P. |
-1.4 |
62.6 |
64.0 |
| 21 |
Maplewood |
-1.6 |
75.0 |
76.5 |
| 22 |
Stillwater |
-2.4 |
50.6 |
53.0 |
| 23 |
S. Colonie |
-2.9 |
60.2 |
63.0 |
| 24 |
Shenendehowa |
-3.5 |
68.0 |
71.5 |
| 25 |
Niskayuna |
-3.8 |
72.8 |
76.5 |
| 26 |
Brunswick |
-4.8 |
48.3 |
53.0 |
| 27 |
Bethlehem |
-5.3 |
70.7 |
76.0 |
| 28 |
N. Colonie |
-5.8 |
71.7 |
77.5 |
| 29 |
E. Greenbush |
-6.0 |
50.5 |
56.5 |
| 30 |
Albany |
-6.4 |
21.7 |
28.0 |
| 31 |
Burnt Hills |
-6.6 |
64.4 |
71.0 |
| 32 |
Schenectady |
-6.7 |
25.4 |
32.0 |
| 33 |
Voorheesville |
-6.8 |
74.7 |
81.5 |
| 34 |
Scotia-Glenville |
-7.0 |
53.6 |
60.5 |
| 35 |
Guilderland |
-8.7 |
63.3 |
72.0 |
| 36 |
Berne-Knox |
-10.1 |
50.0 |
60.0 |
| 37 |
Mohonasen |
-10.6 |
48.4 |
59.0 |
| 38 |
H. Falls |
-12.7 |
41.8 |
54.5 |
| 39 |
Schodack |
-12.9 |
62.2 |
75.0 |
| 40 |
Schalmont |
-14.4 |
47.7 |
62.0 |
| 41 |
G. Island |
-17.9 |
32.1 |
50.0 |
|
AVERAGE |
-1.1 |
53.7 |
54.8 |
|
Average improvement in
scores for schools above average in 1999/2000 |
-5.1 |
|
|
|
Average improvement in
scores for schools below average in 1999/2000 |
2.7 |
|
|
The following graphic shows the grade point
average for the capital district on the 8th-grade ELA exam, which is compared to the area
low, the area high and Scotia-Glenville's GPA. The graph clearly
shows that S-G has average results on the 8th-grade ELA
exam. Any idea that we simply can't be doing better ought to
be flatly rejected. 
|
4th-GRADE
MATH RESULTS

In the above chart, I answer the question,
"How has the number of students performing in each level
changed over time, assuming the same number of students took the
exam each year?" The number of students performing in
each of the levels are based on the average number of students
taking the test from 1999 to 2005. I calculate these numbers using the percentages
provided by the state for each performance level.
Interpretation of Performance
Levels:
Level 4 – exceeds the standards
Level 3 – meets all the standards
Level 2 – meets some of the standards or partially meets the
standards
Level 1 – shows serious academic difficulties.

The
above chart shows the percentage of students scoring in each
level in each of the 42 NY capital district public schools
with elementary schools. The schools are arranged in
order of the percentage of students passing the exam
(scoring at Level 3 or 4) from most to least.
Scotia-Glenville is in 16th place with 93% passing--the best
ever. Its score is outlined in red. Even though
S-G's 4th grade math performance is improving, other
districts are improving even faster. Moreover, S-G
doesn't place nearly as many students in the top level as
better performing schools. For example, Burnt-Hills
has 54% scoring in the top level compared to S-G's 43%. The
following table shows the 1-, 3- and 6-year rankings of
capital district schools based on the percentage of students
passing the 4th-grade math exam. Scotia-Glenville's
performance relative to other area school districts
in 2005 is essentially the same as its 6-year ranking. Table
of Various Rankings Based on MATH-4 Pass Rates
| Rank |
Name |
Percent
Passing 2005 |
Name |
Average
Percent Passing 2003-2005 |
Name |
Average
Percent Passing 2000-2005 |
| 1 |
Edinburg |
100 |
Edinburg |
100.0 |
Voorheesville |
94.6 |
| 2 |
Maplewood |
100 |
Schuylerville |
98.8 |
Maplewood |
93.6 |
| 3 |
Menands |
100 |
Maplewood |
96.8 |
Niskayuna |
93.5 |
| 4 |
Schuylerville |
98.6 |
Menands |
96.3 |
Schuylerville |
93.3 |
| 5 |
E. Greenbush |
97.8 |
Niskayuna |
96.0 |
Bethlehem |
92.7 |
| 6 |
Niskayuna |
97.5 |
E. Greenbush |
95.5 |
Menands |
92.1 |
| 7 |
Burnt Hills |
96.8 |
Voorheesville |
95.4 |
Schodack |
92.0 |
| 8 |
N. Colonie |
96.4 |
Burnt Hills |
94.7 |
Burnt Hills |
91.8 |
| 9 |
S. Glens Falls |
96.1 |
S. Glens Falls |
94.6 |
Averill P. |
91.7 |
| 10 |
Averill P. |
95.9 |
Bethlehem |
94.4 |
S. Glens Falls |
91.6 |
| 11 |
S. Colonie |
95.7 |
N. Colonie |
93.8 |
N. Colonie |
91.2 |
| 12 |
Voorheesville |
95 |
Averill P. |
93.0 |
Edinburg |
90.4 |
| 13 |
Saratoga |
94.3 |
Schalmont |
92.9 |
E. Greenbush |
90.3 |
| 14 |
Duanesburg |
93.7 |
G. Island |
92.2 |
Guilderland |
90.0 |
| 15 |
Bethlehem |
93.1 |
Guilderland |
92.2 |
S. Colonie |
88.1 |
| 16 |
Guilderland |
93.1 |
Schodack |
91.8 |
Scotia-Glenville |
87.9 |
| 17 |
Scotia-Glenville |
93.1 |
S. Colonie |
91.5 |
Stillwater |
86.7 |
| 18 |
G. Island |
92.9 |
Stillwater |
90.8 |
Schalmont |
86.1 |
| 19 |
Shenendehowa |
92.8 |
Saratoga |
90.2 |
Saratoga |
86.1 |
| 20 |
Schodack |
92.7 |
Scotia-Glenville |
89.0 |
Wynantskill |
85.8 |
| 21 |
Schalmont |
91.3 |
Duanesburg |
88.5 |
Mohonasen |
85.5 |
| 22 |
Stillwater |
90.9 |
Shenendehowa |
88.0 |
Shenendehowa |
84.9 |
| 23 |
Mohonasen |
88.8 |
Mohonasen |
87.5 |
Duanesburg |
83.2 |
| 24 |
Berne-Knox |
88 |
H. Valley |
85.2 |
G. Island |
81.6 |
| 25 |
Ballston Spa |
87.4 |
Wynantskill |
85.2 |
Berne-Knox |
80.1 |
| 26 |
Cohoes |
87.2 |
Brunswick |
85.1 |
H. Falls |
80.0 |
| 27 |
Lansingburgh |
86.3 |
Berne-Knox |
84.4 |
Brunswick |
79.9 |
| 28 |
H. Valley |
84.8 |
H. Falls |
83.9 |
H. Valley |
79.7 |
| 29 |
Berlin |
83.5 |
Watervliet |
82.0 |
Cohoes |
78.1 |
| 30 |
H. Falls |
83.5 |
Ballston Spa |
81.8 |
Galway |
78.1 |
| 31 |
Mechanicville |
81.9 |
Cornith |
80.8 |
Ballston Spa |
77.9 |
| 32 |
Waterford |
81.9 |
Cohoes |
80.2 |
Watervliet |
76.9 |
| 33 |
Galway |
81.2 |
Waterford |
79.4 |
Ravena |
76.4 |
| 34 |
Brunswick |
81 |
Ravena |
79.4 |
Mechanicville |
75.0 |
| 35 |
Wynantskill |
80.8 |
Lansingburgh |
79.0 |
Cornith |
74.4 |
| 36 |
Cornith |
80.2 |
Mechanicville |
78.6 |
Waterford |
73.8 |
| 37 |
Rensselaer |
78 |
Berlin |
77.1 |
Lansingburgh |
72.4 |
| 38 |
Ravena |
77.3 |
Galway |
76.7 |
Troy |
66.9 |
| 39 |
Troy |
77.2 |
Rensselaer |
74.8 |
Schenectady |
65.6 |
| 40 |
Watervliet |
76.9 |
Schenectady |
71.4 |
Berlin |
65.4 |
| 41 |
Schenectady |
74.4 |
Troy |
70.1 |
Rensselaer |
63.7 |
| 42 |
Albany |
72.4 |
Albany |
68.9 |
Albany |
61.7 |
|
AVERAGE |
88.8 |
|
86.9 |
|
82.6 |
The following table shows the 1-, 3- and
6-year rankings of the schools based on the percentage of
students performing in Level 4, the top level. East
Greenbush (with about 300 4th-graders) is a good example of
a school district with better top performance than S-G that
has made consistent improvement at a faster rate. Table of Various
Rankings Based on MATH-4 Top Performance
| Rank |
Name |
Top
Performance 2005 |
Name |
Top
Performance 2003-2005 |
Name |
Top
Performance 2000-2005 |
| 1 |
Edinburg |
77.8 |
Niskayuna |
57.6 |
Niskayuna |
50.8 |
| 2 |
Maplewood |
66.7 |
Menands |
54.7 |
Menands |
49.7 |
| 3 |
E. Greenbush |
63.8 |
Guilderland |
53.1 |
Bethlehem |
49.1 |
| 4 |
Menands |
61.9 |
E. Greenbush |
52.6 |
Edinburg |
47.4 |
| 5 |
Guilderland |
60.5 |
Voorheesville |
52.3 |
Voorheesville |
46.9 |
| 6 |
Voorheesville |
56.3 |
Edinburg |
49.9 |
Schodack |
44.8 |
| 7 |
Niskayuna |
54.3 |
Bethlehem |
49.1 |
Burnt Hills |
44.5 |
| 8 |
Burnt Hills |
54 |
Saratoga |
46.4 |
E. Greenbush |
43.2 |
| 9 |
S. Colonie |
54 |
Burnt Hills |
46.2 |
Guilderland |
43.1 |
| 10 |
Saratoga |
51.2 |
S. Glens Falls |
45.8 |
N. Colonie |
41.6 |
| 11 |
S. Glens Falls |
51.2 |
N. Colonie |
45.6 |
Stillwater |
40.4 |
| 12 |
Bethlehem |
50.9 |
S. Colonie |
45.0 |
S. Colonie |
39.2 |
| 13 |
Averill P. |
49.6 |
Stillwater |
42.9 |
S. Glens Falls |
39.1 |
| 14 |
Schuylerville |
48.3 |
Maplewood |
39.8 |
Averill P. |
38.5 |
| 15 |
Ballston Spa |
48.1 |
Schalmont |
39.2 |
Saratoga |
38.4 |
| 16 |
N. Colonie |
46.1 |
Averill P. |
39.1 |
Maplewood |
35.8 |
| 17 |
Stillwater |
44.3 |
Schodack |
39.0 |
Schuylerville |
34.7 |
| 18 |
Scotia-Glenville |
43.2 |
Schuylerville |
37.4 |
Scotia-Glenville |
33.2 |
| 19 |
Duanesburg |
42.2 |
Scotia-Glenville |
36.4 |
Mohonasen |
32.2 |
| 20 |
Schalmont |
41.3 |
Shenendehowa |
35.1 |
Shenendehowa |
31.7 |
| 21 |
Schodack |
39.4 |
Ballston Spa |
34.2 |
Schalmont |
31.6 |
| 22 |
Mohonasen |
37.6 |
Duanesburg |
33.5 |
Wynantskill |
29.5 |
| 23 |
Shenendehowa |
34.9 |
Mohonasen |
33.3 |
Duanesburg |
29.4 |
| 24 |
Cohoes |
32.3 |
G. Island |
33.2 |
Ballston Spa |
29.3 |
| 25 |
G. Island |
32.1 |
H. Valley |
30.8 |
G. Island |
27.6 |
| 26 |
H. Falls |
32 |
H. Falls |
30.3 |
H. Valley |
26.1 |
| 27 |
H. Valley |
31.3 |
Ravena |
28.4 |
Berne-Knox |
25.2 |
| 28 |
Berne-Knox |
30.7 |
Berne-Knox |
27.6 |
H. Falls |
24.6 |
| 29 |
Lansingburgh |
30.3 |
Brunswick |
26.7 |
Brunswick |
23.6 |
| 30 |
Ravena |
30.2 |
Cornith |
25.9 |
Ravena |
23.3 |
| 31 |
Cornith |
26.4 |
Wynantskill |
24.1 |
Cohoes |
21.4 |
| 32 |
Galway |
23.5 |
Cohoes |
22.6 |
Galway |
21.2 |
| 33 |
Brunswick |
22.9 |
Lansingburgh |
21.7 |
Cornith |
20.6 |
| 34 |
Schenectady |
22.7 |
Watervliet |
21.4 |
Watervliet |
19.2 |
| 35 |
Albany |
21 |
Waterford |
19.9 |
Lansingburgh |
18.7 |
| 36 |
Rensselaer |
20.9 |
Schenectady |
19.7 |
Schenectady |
16.9 |
| 37 |
Troy |
20.4 |
Berlin |
19.4 |
Berlin |
16.7 |
| 38 |
Waterford |
18.2 |
Galway |
18.4 |
Waterford |
15.9 |
| 39 |
Mechanicville |
18.1 |
Albany |
18.2 |
Albany |
15.7 |
| 40 |
Wynantskill |
17.3 |
Troy |
16.0 |
Troy |
15.2 |
| 41 |
Watervliet |
16.5 |
Rensselaer |
13.7 |
Mechanicville |
14.5 |
| 42 |
Berlin |
15.1 |
Mechanicville |
12.3 |
Rensselaer |
10.5 |
|
AVERAGE |
39.0 |
|
34.2 |
|
31.0 |
The next table answers the questions,
"Which schools are making the most improvement and how
much improvement are they making?" This chart
uses all 7 years of math scores. I average the
percentage of students passing the exams in each school for
1999 and 2000 and compare this to the average of the
percentage of students passing the exams in each school for
2004 and 2005. This can be interpreted as an analysis
of improvement over 3 years.
On average, schools have added 8.9 points to
the percentage of students passing the 4th grade math exam.
Schools that had above average pass rates for 1999-2000 have
added an average of 4.2 points to the percentage of students
passing the exam. Schools with below average pass
rates for 1999-2000 have added an average of 14.7 points to
their pass rates. Factors that can cause improvements
in scores (here)
include:
Scotia-Glenville ranks 32nd in
"improvement." Niskayuna's improvement is
nearly twice as large as S-G's despite its higher average
pass rate for 1999 and 2000.
Table of Improvement on
the MATH-4 Exam
| Rank |
Name |
Point
Improvement to Pass Rate |
2004
& 2005 Average Percentage Passing |
1999
& 2000 Average Percentage Passing |
| 1 |
Rensselaer |
30.4 |
77.4 |
47.0 |
| 2 |
Edinburg |
27.0 |
100.0 |
73.0 |
| 3 |
G. Island |
20.0 |
90.5 |
70.5 |
| 4 |
H. Valley |
18.3 |
86.3 |
68.0 |
| 5 |
Schalmont |
18.0 |
92.5 |
74.5 |
| 6 |
Schuylerville |
17.1 |
98.6 |
81.5 |
| 7 |
Albany |
16.5 |
71.0 |
54.5 |
| 8 |
Troy |
15.5 |
70.0 |
54.5 |
| 9 |
S. Colonie |
15.4 |
91.9 |
76.5 |
| 10 |
Berne-Knox |
14.9 |
87.4 |
72.5 |
| 11 |
Lansingburgh |
13.7 |
79.2 |
65.5 |
| 12 |
Watervliet |
13.2 |
80.2 |
67.0 |
| 13 |
Berlin |
13.2 |
77.7 |
64.5 |
| 14 |
Schenectady |
12.9 |
72.4 |
59.5 |
| 15 |
Mechanicville |
12.9 |
79.4 |
66.5 |
| 16 |
Ravena |
12.1 |
78.1 |
66.0 |
| 17 |
Saratoga |
11.8 |
91.3 |
79.5 |
| 18 |
S. Glens Falls |
10.4 |
95.9 |
85.5 |
| 19 |
Burnt Hills |
9.3 |
95.8 |
86.5 |
| 20 |
E. Greenbush |
8.7 |
96.2 |
87.5 |
| 21 |
Niskayuna |
7.8 |
97.9 |
90.0 |
| 22 |
N. Colonie |
7.8 |
95.4 |
87.5 |
| 23 |
Ballston Spa |
7.6 |
83.6 |
76.0 |
| 24 |
Mohonasen |
7.4 |
87.9 |
80.5 |
| 25 |
H. Falls |
7.4 |
81.4 |
74.0 |
| 26 |
Averill P. |
6.8 |
93.4 |
86.5 |
| 27 |
Shenendehowa |
6.3 |
88.4 |
82.0 |
| 28 |
Stillwater |
5.5 |
91.0 |
85.5 |
| 29 |
Cohoes |
5.4 |
82.4 |
77.0 |
| 30 |
Cornith |
4.8 |
80.8 |
76.0 |
| 31 |
Bethlehem |
4.7 |
94.7 |
90.0 |
| 32 |
Scotia-Glenville |
4.3 |
92.3 |
88.0 |
| 33 |
Voorheesville |
2.8 |
95.3 |
92.5 |
| 34 |
Guilderland |
2.6 |
93.1 |
90.5 |
| 35 |
Duanesburg |
2.5 |
89.0 |
86.5 |
| 36 |
Brunswick |
1.3 |
82.3 |
81.0 |
| 37 |
Menands |
1.0 |
94.5 |
93.5 |
| 38 |
Schodack |
0.8 |
92.8 |
92.0 |
| 39 |
Maplewood |
-2.3 |
97.8 |
100.0 |
| 40 |
Galway |
-2.8 |
77.3 |
80.0 |
| 41 |
Waterford |
-4.3 |
79.2 |
83.5 |
| 42 |
Wynantskill |
-13.3 |
81.7 |
95.0 |
|
AVERAGE |
8.9 |
87.2 |
78.3 |
|
Average improvement in
scores for schools above average in 1999/2000 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
Average improvement in
scores for schools below average in 1999/2000 |
14.7 |
|
|
The following graphic shows the grade point
average for the capital district, which has been calculated by
summing the scores for all pupils and finding the average by
awarding 0.55 for Level 1, 1.7 for Level 2, 2.85 for Level 3 and
4.0 for Level 4. The area GPA is then compared to the area
low, the area high and Scotia-Glenville's GPA. The graph shows
that S-G is struggling to break away from the average
performance trendline. S-G's performance
in 2005 was not as good as it was in 1999 relative to other
area schools.

8th-GRADE
MATH RESULTS
8th-grade math
hasn't improved as much as 4th-grade math. In fact,
most of the "improvement" shown in this chart is
very likely due to changes made by the state in things like
exam content, cut-off scores and the standards that define
proficiency. One luxury middle school teachers don't have
relative to elementary teachers is to drop items from the
curriculum and to curtail recess so more instructional time
can be devoted to math. The middle school curriculum is
packed with mandates. The second article in this
post suggests that elementary schools may have increased
math instruction time by 60%.
The above chart shows the percentage of
students scoring in each level in each of the 41 NY capital
district public schools with 8th grades. The schools are
arranged in order of the percentage of students passing the
exam (scoring at Level 3 or 4) from most to least.
Scotia-Glenville is in 12th place--matching its ranking in
2000 and missing its 2001 ranking by one place. Its
score is outlined in red.
The following table shows the 1-, 3- and
6-year rankings of capital district schools based on the
percentage of students passing the 8th-grade math exam.
Scotia-Glenville's 2005 average performance is better than it
has been in recent years, however the percentage of its
students scoring in the top level took a dive this year,
falling from 16.7% last year to 9.2% this year. Other
districts also saw a similar but smaller drop.
Table
of Various Rankings Based on MATH-8 Pass Rates
| Rank |
Name |
Percent
Passing 2005 |
Name |
Average
Percent Passing 2003-2005 |
Name |
Average
Percent Passing 2000-2005 |
| 1 |
Voorheesville |
87.4 |
N. Colonie |
87.4 |
N. Colonie |
83.2 |
| 2 |
Niskayuna |
85.2 |
Voorheesville |
86.7 |
Niskayuna |
81.9 |
| 3 |
Duanesburg |
85.1 |
Niskayuna |
84.5 |
Voorheesville |
80.8 |
| 4 |
N. Colonie |
84.7 |
Maplewood |
84.1 |
Duanesburg |
76.1 |
| 5 |
Burnt Hills |
84.6 |
Mechanicville |
82.1 |
Menands |
75.1 |
| 6 |
S. Colonie |
81.9 |
Duanesburg |
81.7 |
Burnt Hills |
74.4 |
| 7 |
Menands |
81.5 |
S. Colonie |
81.0 |
Bethlehem |
72.9 |
| 8 |
Maplewood |
81.2 |
Burnt Hills |
79.5 |
Schodack |
72.4 |
| 9 |
Mechanicville |
80.6 |
Menands |
77.9 |
S. Colonie |
72.2 |
| 10 |
Schalmont |
77.5 |
Schuylerville |
76.9 |
Shenendehowa |
72.0 |
| 11 |
Shenendehowa |
77.2 |
Schodack |
76.0 |
Mechanicville |
71.1 |
| 12 |
Scotia-Glenville |
77 |
S. Glens Falls |
75.5 |
Guilderland |
70.0 |
| 13 |
Bethlehem |
75.7 |
Bethlehem |
75.1 |
Averill P. |
69.3 |
| 14 |
Saratoga |
73.5 |
Shenendehowa |
73.9 |
Stillwater |
68.4 |
| 15 |
Berne-Knox |
71 |
Guilderland |
73.6 |
S. Glens Falls |
66.9 |
| 16 |
Ballston Spa |
70.5 |
Saratoga |
72.7 |
Maplewood |
66.6 |
| 17 |
E. Greenbush |
70.3 |
Stillwater |
71.4 |
Saratoga |
66.5 |
| 18 |
Schodack |
70.2 |
Ballston Spa |
70.3 |
Scotia-Glenville |
66.2 |
| 19 |
S. Glens Falls |
69.5 |
Scotia-Glenville |
70.1 |
E. Greenbush |
64.9 |
| 20 |
Mohonasen |
68 |
Galway |
69.6 |
Wynantskill |
64.7 |
| 21 |
Averill P. |
67.1 |
E. Greenbush |
69.3 |
Schuylerville |
62.8 |
| 22 |
Cohoes |
66.5 |
Averill P. |
69.2 |
Ballston Spa |
62.5 |
| 23 |
Guilderland |
65.5 |
Berne-Knox |
68.8 |
Berne-Knox |
62.0 |
| 24 |
Ravena |
62.9 |
Mohonasen |
66.6 |
Mohonasen |
60.4 |
| 25 |
Stillwater |
62.3 |
Cohoes |
66.5 |
Galway |
60.0 |
| 26 |
Wynantskill |
62.2 |
Schalmont |
65.6 |
Cohoes |
59.7 |
| 27 |
Schuylerville |
60.3 |
Wynantskill |
63.3 |
Schalmont |
58.6 |
| 28 |
H. Valley |
59.6 |
Brunswick |
58.6 |
Brunswick |
54.8 |
| 29 |
Waterford |
57.8 |
H. Valley |
57.8 |
H. Valley |
51.1 |
| 30 |
Lansingburgh |
56.4 |
Ravena |
56.8 |
Ravena |
50.6 |
| 31 |
Brunswick |
55.3 |
Cornith |
54.8 |
Cornith |
49.7 |
| 32 |
Berlin |
52.4 |
Waterford |
53.3 |
H. Falls |
47.2 |
| 33 |
Galway |
51.4 |
Lansingburgh |
51.6 |
Waterford |
44.4 |
| 34 |
Cornith |
46.3 |
Berlin |
50.6 |
Berlin |
42.5 |
| 35 |
H. Falls |
46 |
H. Falls |
48.9 |
Lansingburgh |
41.8 |
| 36 |
Troy |
42.8 |
Troy |
43.0 |
G. Island |
39.1 |
| 37 |
Schenectady |
32.5 |
G. Island |
33.6 |
Troy |
39.0 |
| 38 |
G. Island |
30.4 |
Schenectady |
31.4 |
Watervliet |
32.1 |
| 39 |
Watervliet |
30.3 |
Rensselaer |
29.2 |
Schenectady |
27.5 |
| 40 |
Rensselaer |
28.3 |
Albany |
28.6 |
Rensselaer |
26.2 |
| 41 |
Albany |
23.3 |
Watervliet |
26.2 |
Albany |
24.7 |
|
AVERAGE |
63.7 |
|
64.5 |
|
59.3 |
The following table shows the 1-, 3- and
6-year rankings of the schools based on the percentage of
students performing in Level 4, the top level. S-G ranks
21st, down from its 6-year rank of 16th. Table of Various
Rankings Based on MATH-8 Top Performance
| Rank |
Name |
Top
Performance 2005 |
Name |
Top
Performance 2003-2005 |
Name |
Top
Performance 2000-2005 |
| 1 |
N. Colonie |
26.1 |
N. Colonie |
33.0 |
Niskayuna |
29.9 |
| 2 |
Niskayuna |
25.4 |
Niskayuna |
27.2 |
N. Colonie |
29.6 |
| 3 |
Voorheesville |
24.3 |
Maplewood |
26.6 |
Bethlehem |
23.8 |
| 4 |
Ballston Spa |
22.3 |
Voorheesville |
25.6 |
Voorheesville |
19.9 |
| 5 |
S. Colonie |
19.1 |
Mechanicville |
21.4 |
Menands |
19.9 |
| 6 |
Maplewood |
18.8 |
Menands |
21.4 |
Shenendehowa |
17.9 |
| 7 |
Mechanicville |
18.4 |
Ballston Spa |
20.7 |
Schodack |
16.5 |
| 8 |
Duanesburg |
16.2 |
Bethlehem |
20.7 |
Mechanicville |
16.2 |
| 9 |
Burnt Hills |
16.1 |
Shenendehowa |
17.3 |
Burnt Hills |
16.1 |
| 10 |
Saratoga |
16.1 |
S. Colonie |
17.3 |
Ballston Spa |
15.7 |
| 11 |
Shenendehowa |
15.2 |
Burnt Hills |
17.3 |
Averill P. |
14.4 |
| 12 |
Bethlehem |
15.1 |
Galway |
17.1 |
Saratoga |
14.3 |
| 13 |
Stillwater |
12.2 |
Duanesburg |
16.5 |
Guilderland |
14.3 |
| 14 |
Schalmont |
12.1 |
Schodack |
16.0 |
Maplewood |
14.3 |
| 15 |
E. Greenbush |
11.3 |
Guilderland |
15.0 |
S. Colonie |
14.0 |
| 16 |
Menands |
11.1 |
Saratoga |
14.7 |
Scotia-Glenville |
13.8 |
| 17 |
Mohonasen |
10.8 |
S. Glens Falls |
14.1 |
Stillwater |
13.0 |
| 18 |
Ravena |
9.9 |
Schuylerville |
13.9 |
E. Greenbush |
12.3 |
| 19 |
Guilderland |
9.6 |
Mohonasen |
13.5 |
Brunswick |
11.7 |
| 20 |
Schuylerville |
9.5 |
Stillwater |
13.1 |
S. Glens Falls |
11.5 |
| 21 |
Scotia-Glenville |
9.2 |
E. Greenbush |
12.8 |
Galway |
11.0 |
| 22 |
Wynantskill |
8.9 |
Scotia-Glenville |
12.5 |
Cohoes |
10.6 |
| 23 |
S. Glens Falls |
8.5 |
Averill P. |
11.7 |
Schuylerville |
10.5 |
| 24 |
Cohoes |
8.2 |
Brunswick |
11.7 |
Mohonasen |
10.1 |
| 25 |
Brunswick |
7.9 |
Berne-Knox |
10.2 |
Duanesburg |
10.0 |
| 26 |
Schodack |
7.7 |
Cohoes |
9.6 |
Berne-Knox |
9.8 |
| 27 |
Galway |
7.3 |
Schalmont |
9.3 |
Schalmont |
8.8 |
| 28 |
H. Valley |
7.1 |
Ravena |
8.4 |
Wynantskill |
8.5 |
| 29 |
Averill P. |
6.9 |
Wynantskill |
8.1 |
Ravena |
8.5 |
| 30 |
Berne-Knox |
6 |
H. Valley |
6.3 |
H. Valley |
5.9 |
| 31 |
Lansingburgh |
3.2 |
Lansingburgh |
6.3 |
G. Island |
5.9 |
| 32 |
Troy |
2.8 |
Cornith |
5.2 |
Cornith |
5.8 |
| 33 |
Cornith |
2.7 |
H. Falls |
4.9 |
Lansingburgh |
5.4 |
| 34 |
Berlin |
2.4 |
Troy |
4.1 |
H. Falls |
5.0 |
| 35 |
Schenectady |
2.4 |
G. Island |
3.9 |
Troy |
4.3 |
| 36 |
H. Falls |
1 |
Berlin |
3.7 |
Berlin |
3.2 |
| 37 |
Rensselaer |
0.9 |
Albany |
2.7 |
Albany |
2.8 |
| 38 |
Albany |
0.8 |
Schenectady |
2.6 |
Schenectady |
2.5 |
| 39 |
Watervliet |
0.8 |
Rensselaer |
1.1 |
Watervliet |
1.4 |
| 40 |
G. Island |
0 |
Waterford |
0.5 |
Waterford |
1.1 |
| 41 |
Waterford |
0 |
Watervliet |
0.3 |
Rensselaer |
1.0 |
|
AVERAGE |
10.1 |
|
12.6 |
|
11.5 |
The next table answers the questions,
"Which schools are making the most improvement and how
much improvement are they making?" On average,
schools gained 14.2 points of the percentage of students
passing the 8th grade math exam. Schools that had above
average pass rates for 1999-2000 gained an average of 10.2
points of the percentage of students passing the exam. Schools
with below average pass rates for 1999-2000 added an average
of 18.4 points to their pass rates. As mentioned above,
most of the improvement on this exam appears to have
originated at the state Education Department and not in
classrooms.
Scotia-Glenville ranks 23rd in improvement,
which is better than its improvement ranking on other exams
but still several percentage points lower than the
improvements made by higher performing schools like Duanesburg,
Burnt Hills and South Colonie.
Table of Improvement on
the MATH-8 Exam
| Rank |
Name |
Point
Improvement to Pass Rate |
2004
& 2005 Average Percentage Passing |
1999
& 2000 Average Percentage Passing |
| 1 |
Schuylerville |
41.3 |
72.8 |
31.5 |
| 2 |
Mechanicville |
37 |
84 |
47 |
| 3 |
Lansingburgh |
26.1 |
52.15 |
26 |
| 4 |
Cohoes |
25.9 |
69.4 |
43.5 |
| 5 |
Mohonasen |
25.8 |
69.3 |
43.5 |
| 6 |
H. Valley |
25.75 |
58.75 |
33 |
| 7 |
S. Glens Falls |
25.05 |
73.55 |
48.5 |
| 8 |
Ravena |
23.25 |
58.75 |
35.5 |
| 9 |
Ballston Spa |
22.75 |
73.75 |
51 |
| 10 |
Galway |
21.5 |
63.5 |
42 |
| 11 |
Berne-Knox |
21.1 |
72.1 |
51 |
| 12 |
S. Colonie |
21 |
82.5 |
61.5 |
| 13 |
Waterford |
19.45 |
54.95 |
35.5 |
| 14 |
Cornith |
18.9 |
52.4 |
33.5 |
| 15 |
Menands |
17.95 |
79.95 |
62 |
| 16 |
Burnt Hills |
17.8 |
83.3 |
65.5 |
| 17 |
Schalmont |
17.8 |
65.8 |
48 |
| 18 |
Saratoga |
17.65 |
75.65 |
58 |
| 19 |
Duanesburg |
17.15 |
85.15 |
68 |
| 20 |
E. Greenbush |
16.7 |
70.2 |
53.5 |
| 21 |
Voorheesville |
13.45 |
88.45 |
75 |
| 22 |
Troy |
12.75 |
43.75 |
31 |
| 23 |
Scotia-Glenville |
12.35 |
72.85 |
60.5 |
| 24 |
N. Colonie |
10.75 |
86.75 |
76 |
| 25 |
Rensselaer |
10.05 |
27.05 |
17 |
| 26 |
Shenendehowa |
9.3 |
76.3 |
67 |
| 27 |
Schenectady |
8.9 |
32.9 |
24 |
| 28 |
Niskayuna |
8.7 |
86.2 |
77.5 |
| 29 |
Berlin |
8.4 |
46.9 |
38.5 |
| 30 |
Guilderland |
8.3 |
72.3 |
64 |
| 31 |
Albany |
7.35 |
29.35 |
22 |
| 32 |
Brunswick |
5.6 |
55.6 |
50 |
| 33 |
Watervliet |
5.1 |
27.1 |
22 |
| 34 |
Bethlehem |
4.5 |
75 |
70.5 |
| 35 |
Maplewood |
3.75 |
87.25 |
83.5 |
| 36 |
Schodack |
3.7 |
75.7 |
72 |
| 37 |
H. Falls |
2.6 |
45.6 |
43 |
| 38 |
Averill P. |
2.5 |
68.5 |
66 |
| 39 |
Stillwater |
-0.55 |
66.95 |
67.5 |
| 40 |
Wynantskill |
-2.4 |
61.1 |
63.5 |
| 41 |
G. Island |
-13.3 |
38.7 |
52 |
|
AVERAGE |
14.2 |
64.9 |
50.7 |
|
Average improvement in
scores for schools above average in 1999/2000 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
Average improvement in
scores for schools below average in 1999/2000 |
18.4 |
|
|
The following graphic
shows the grade point average for the capital district on the
8th-grade math exam, which is compared to the area low, the
area high and Scotia-Glenville's GPA. The graph shows S-G's
GPA increased as all other area GPAs declined, putting us
closer to the top performing area school district than we've
ever been. This commendable achievement is dampened
somewhat by the relatively low percentage of our students
scoring in the top level. By this measure, the
district's performance was average. High academic
standards were supposed to "raise all boats," not
crowd them into the middle. 
The
final graphic shows the grade point average for the
capital district on the 4th- and 8th-grade math and ELA
exams, which is compared to the area low, the area high and
Scotia-Glenville's GPA. The graph shows S-G's GPA is the
best ever but closer to the average than in the early
years. Considering exam content and scoring changes
designed to improve pass rates since the inception of state
exams, S-G's 2005 GPA of 2.78 is probably a little worse than
its 1999 GPA of 2.67. It's called grade inflation.
Even if the improvement is real, it amounts to 50% of the
students getting one more question right on each of the 4
exams after 6 years of effort! More than anything,
it proves the system produces the results it's designed to
produce and only system change can dramatically improve
academic outcomes. Whatever else might be said, this is
nowhere near the amount of improvement American students need
to be globally competitive. See here.
We need schools for The
21st Century Student. 
|
|